![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unless "defaced" is a technical flag term I don't think it is a well chosen word. And if it is, maybe an explanation or a link to one would be appropriate. Osomec 2 July 2005 22:57 (UTC)
Defaced is a technical term, I've linked to a definition Zedcaster 05:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC) This is the offical flag of BC right, the correct image??
If this was only introduced in 1960, what was the flag before and why was it decided to replace it ? -- Beardo ( talk) 21:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Since I was a kid I heard about the Union flag originally being on the bottom, but I've never seen a source for that and there isn't one here. I think it's an urban legend.
This article seems very strangely written, a minimum amount of information wrapped around a constant harping on Canada's imperial connections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.28.248 ( talk) 20:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Flag of British Columbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unless "defaced" is a technical flag term I don't think it is a well chosen word. And if it is, maybe an explanation or a link to one would be appropriate. Osomec 2 July 2005 22:57 (UTC)
Defaced is a technical term, I've linked to a definition Zedcaster 05:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC) This is the offical flag of BC right, the correct image??
If this was only introduced in 1960, what was the flag before and why was it decided to replace it ? -- Beardo ( talk) 21:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Since I was a kid I heard about the Union flag originally being on the bottom, but I've never seen a source for that and there isn't one here. I think it's an urban legend.
This article seems very strangely written, a minimum amount of information wrapped around a constant harping on Canada's imperial connections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.28.248 ( talk) 20:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Flag of British Columbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)