![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Amok trey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Speaking as the guy who more or less wrote the entire article (though i didn't start the article), I think this article should be deleted. I was a new editor when I first wrote most of it, now I've learnt more about Wikipedia. I don't think any of the sources cited really constitute reliable sources. I don't think the article has notability. Apples&Manzanas ( talk) 20:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Amok trey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Speaking as the guy who more or less wrote the entire article (though i didn't start the article), I think this article should be deleted. I was a new editor when I first wrote most of it, now I've learnt more about Wikipedia. I don't think any of the sources cited really constitute reliable sources. I don't think the article has notability. Apples&Manzanas ( talk) 20:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)