This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 13, 2018, October 13, 2020, October 13, 2022, and October 13, 2023. |
This article contains a translation of Chiến tranh ÄÆ°á»ng – Cao Câu Ly lần thứ nhất from vi.wikipedia. |
This article is well-balanced overall. However, there are a few parts where I would have to say there was some Chinese POV, such as suggesting that Yeon Gaesomun was "arrogant" in his treatment to the Tang emissaries. Perhaps taking words that express personal opinion out of the article. Also, Yeon Gaesomun was not a magniji, but a Dae Magniji. -- Kprideboi ( talk) 19:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Other articles/sources state 10-20,000 Tang soldiers were killed during the Seige of Ansi, would anyone oppose me changing the figure to 12-22,000 Tang dead?
Jegal (
talk)
17:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
According to Template:Infobox military conflict, the result field should be as follows:
So to be clear, the first and most important description in the result section should be "X victory", "Decisive X victory", etc. In this case, the result was a "Decisive Goguryeo victory".
You cited my additions to the
Goryeo-Khitan War page as a "new position" regarding the result field, however it follows the guidelines listed above. It clearly makes use of one of the standard terms: "Goryeo Dynasty Victory". The guidelines do not exclude the use of other important components of the final result, such as concluding peace agreements, territorial changes, etc. See the
American Civil War page,
World War II page, and other established articles as a reference.
However, the result section should not be a summary of the events that took place, like in your revision: "Goguryeo relief force to Ansi fortress defeated,[1] however Tang attempts to take Ansi are defeated and successful defense of Ansi fortress forces the Tang army to withdraw from Goguryeo[2]". Here, none of the standard terms are used and none of the additional information you provided actually pertains to the final result of the conflict. BlackRanger88 ( talk) 17:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 13, 2018, October 13, 2020, October 13, 2022, and October 13, 2023. |
This article contains a translation of Chiến tranh ÄÆ°á»ng – Cao Câu Ly lần thứ nhất from vi.wikipedia. |
This article is well-balanced overall. However, there are a few parts where I would have to say there was some Chinese POV, such as suggesting that Yeon Gaesomun was "arrogant" in his treatment to the Tang emissaries. Perhaps taking words that express personal opinion out of the article. Also, Yeon Gaesomun was not a magniji, but a Dae Magniji. -- Kprideboi ( talk) 19:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Other articles/sources state 10-20,000 Tang soldiers were killed during the Seige of Ansi, would anyone oppose me changing the figure to 12-22,000 Tang dead?
Jegal (
talk)
17:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
According to Template:Infobox military conflict, the result field should be as follows:
So to be clear, the first and most important description in the result section should be "X victory", "Decisive X victory", etc. In this case, the result was a "Decisive Goguryeo victory".
You cited my additions to the
Goryeo-Khitan War page as a "new position" regarding the result field, however it follows the guidelines listed above. It clearly makes use of one of the standard terms: "Goryeo Dynasty Victory". The guidelines do not exclude the use of other important components of the final result, such as concluding peace agreements, territorial changes, etc. See the
American Civil War page,
World War II page, and other established articles as a reference.
However, the result section should not be a summary of the events that took place, like in your revision: "Goguryeo relief force to Ansi fortress defeated,[1] however Tang attempts to take Ansi are defeated and successful defense of Ansi fortress forces the Tang army to withdraw from Goguryeo[2]". Here, none of the standard terms are used and none of the additional information you provided actually pertains to the final result of the conflict. BlackRanger88 ( talk) 17:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)