This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Firesheep article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The "Security Now" podcasts (#'s 272 and 273) discuss what using WiFi encryption (both WEP and WPA) does to prevent Firesheep from listening in to browser sessions on a public Wifi hotspot. In #272 ( http://media.grc.com/sn/sn-272.mp3) the concept of using encryption to foil Firesheep is discussed. In #273 ( http://media.grc.com/sn/sn-273.mp3) the difference between WEP and WPA encryption and what that means to Firesheep is discussed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.133.62.41 ( talk) 11:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
This is one of the best written articles I have read on a technical subject in Wikipedia. It only provides as much information as is required to understand the subject and the context of the subject, and it does this very well.
Well done. H.E. Hall ( talk) 15:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey there, I went ahead and removed the countermeasures subsection as well as the warning banner from the top because the past-tense info remaining was in the countermeasures section. Given that this software is defunct, keeping countermeasures on it seems not notable and somewhat original research. Johnathlon ( talk) 17:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Firesheep article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The "Security Now" podcasts (#'s 272 and 273) discuss what using WiFi encryption (both WEP and WPA) does to prevent Firesheep from listening in to browser sessions on a public Wifi hotspot. In #272 ( http://media.grc.com/sn/sn-272.mp3) the concept of using encryption to foil Firesheep is discussed. In #273 ( http://media.grc.com/sn/sn-273.mp3) the difference between WEP and WPA encryption and what that means to Firesheep is discussed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.133.62.41 ( talk) 11:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
This is one of the best written articles I have read on a technical subject in Wikipedia. It only provides as much information as is required to understand the subject and the context of the subject, and it does this very well.
Well done. H.E. Hall ( talk) 15:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey there, I went ahead and removed the countermeasures subsection as well as the warning banner from the top because the past-tense info remaining was in the countermeasures section. Given that this software is defunct, keeping countermeasures on it seems not notable and somewhat original research. Johnathlon ( talk) 17:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)