![]() | Marth (Fire Emblem) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 February 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light is part of the Main Fire Emblem series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
99% of the article comes from the original Fire Emblem article - Thanks people for this great snippet
The other 1% is the release date, taken from Gamefaqs.com -- ren 00:34, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Fire Emblem: Ankoku Ryū to Hikari no Tsurugi or Fire Emblem: Ankoku Ryuu to Hikari no Tsurugi? I think we need to come to a consensus on the use of the "ū". Other Fire Emblem articles use the "ū" or the related "ō" in their titles as necessary so why is this one different? Axem Titanium 02:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
I feel that it is important to make a page with the characters from Fire Emblem one so we can clarify the comparisons like how Seth is the Jeigan. I do not know enough about the characters and enough about the works of Wikipedia yet to currently contribute this exact article, but I'd be happy if someone would acknowledge that. David Martin Chao 22:28, 01 December 2006 (Pacific Coast Time)
According to the Smash Bros. DOJO!!, the official English name for this Fire Emblem title is "Shadow Dragons and the Blade of Light". Parrothead1983 ( talk) 05:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
The anon's edit is correct; it's "hikari no ken" according to ja:Wikipedia. Should the page be moved?— Loveはドコ? ( talk • contribs) 08:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Marth currently does not have enough information to warrant an article, so this is the best place for it to be covered. It needs real world information in order to exist otherwise. TTN ( talk) 18:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Marth was the original main character for Fire Emblem, and he is recieving a revival on modern day format. I think for now, his article should be left alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.4.204.47 ( talk) 07:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
There is exact 0% that says it shall be merged, with his appearances in other games. 90.228.241.157 ( talk · contribs) 20:48 GMT +01 February, 2 2008
But there is no out-of-universe information to establish any notability, and I personally can't find any decent sources that comment on Marth exclusively, except from detailing hus role in games. It's all well and good that he's been in some games, but there is notthing to build a decent article. Ashnard Talk Contribs 17:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please, if he is as notable as you say, please find some third-party sources that comment on Marth extensively to support your argument. Thanks. Ashnard Talk Contribs 19:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia where only certain information is allowed. Adolf Hitler would be proud of TTN. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.248.8.244 (
talk)
01:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Ashnard is the only person who thinks this article isn't notable enough to exist, so let's just ignore him. Wikipedia is about expanding knowledge, not cutting it down and merging articles with others (which only serves to make finding the information harder, because Wikipedia's search function sucks)
Is deleting shit completely to turn it into a 1-2 sentence bit on some other page helping to improve wikipedia? This makes absolutely no sense at all, wtf
wikipedia is supposed to be about having information on EVERYTHING, not just saying "piss off, the thing you were going to write about isn't important enough for us"
This Assnerd guy is pretty much an asshole m i rite?
I was going to use Wikipedia for my Presidential campaign, but now that it has an article dedicated to Marth, I'm gonna have to pass. It really does hurt Wikipedia's already established and well-known credibility. - HClinton42 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.234.100.199 ( talk) 01:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Not enough material for an article? This article proves you wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.88.197 ( talk) 01:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Cut the personal attacks please. Ashnard, I am unsure, by the way, whether the article up for merge here warrants merging. It seems a notable character to me, because of the role the character played in popularising the whole series in the English-speaking world. That information doesn't really belong on this article (as it's about another game!), so where would you put it? User:Krator ( t c) 13:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Ashnard, the only person who wants to reduce the amount of information on Wikipedia is you. What on earth would the benefit be of cutting down the wealth of information that Wikipedia has and making it harder for somebody to find what little information is left? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.204.136.139 ( talk) 15:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
I just threw this together really quick to show the necessary information. I don't know about the quality of everything, but it should be close to the final result. TTN ( talk) 15:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
TTN, your version just about sums up the necessary points, although it may need to be altered slightly so it's within the context of a characters section, because that reads a bit more like a lead. Still great, just needs to be from the viewpoint of this game a bit more if it's merged into this article. Thanks. Ashnard Talk Contribs 08:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Regardless of consensus or not we are strictly not allowed to merge any episodes or character information as per an arbcom injunction. I'm not taking a side just telling everyone to wait until arbcom is over. -- Sin Harvest ( talk) 10:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
While playing Smash Bros. Brawl last night, I unlocked the sticker for the Fire Emblem character "Shiida" as opposed to "Sheeda." Should we consider "Shiida" the official spelling of the character's name for now? Given that the Fire Emblem DS game is a remake and all characters from this game will appear in FEDS, should we adjust the naming as we know more, or wait until FEDS is released with an English translation?-- 75.92.186.211 ( talk) 02:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Speaking of which, I think Ricard's name (リカード Rikādo) should be listed in the Character name list as "Ricardo". I mean, yeah, that name exists in the English world, so why not list his name as Ricardo? 168.12.253.66 ( talk) 20:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Is the DS remake ( Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon) independently notable from the original Famicom/NES ( Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light)? George Ho ( talk) 03:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 21:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: IDV ( talk · contribs) 23:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I'll be back with a review soon, at latest on Monday but probably before that.-- IDV talk 23:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Marth (Fire Emblem) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 February 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light is part of the Main Fire Emblem series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
99% of the article comes from the original Fire Emblem article - Thanks people for this great snippet
The other 1% is the release date, taken from Gamefaqs.com -- ren 00:34, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Fire Emblem: Ankoku Ryū to Hikari no Tsurugi or Fire Emblem: Ankoku Ryuu to Hikari no Tsurugi? I think we need to come to a consensus on the use of the "ū". Other Fire Emblem articles use the "ū" or the related "ō" in their titles as necessary so why is this one different? Axem Titanium 02:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
I feel that it is important to make a page with the characters from Fire Emblem one so we can clarify the comparisons like how Seth is the Jeigan. I do not know enough about the characters and enough about the works of Wikipedia yet to currently contribute this exact article, but I'd be happy if someone would acknowledge that. David Martin Chao 22:28, 01 December 2006 (Pacific Coast Time)
According to the Smash Bros. DOJO!!, the official English name for this Fire Emblem title is "Shadow Dragons and the Blade of Light". Parrothead1983 ( talk) 05:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
The anon's edit is correct; it's "hikari no ken" according to ja:Wikipedia. Should the page be moved?— Loveはドコ? ( talk • contribs) 08:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Marth currently does not have enough information to warrant an article, so this is the best place for it to be covered. It needs real world information in order to exist otherwise. TTN ( talk) 18:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Marth was the original main character for Fire Emblem, and he is recieving a revival on modern day format. I think for now, his article should be left alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.4.204.47 ( talk) 07:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
There is exact 0% that says it shall be merged, with his appearances in other games. 90.228.241.157 ( talk · contribs) 20:48 GMT +01 February, 2 2008
But there is no out-of-universe information to establish any notability, and I personally can't find any decent sources that comment on Marth exclusively, except from detailing hus role in games. It's all well and good that he's been in some games, but there is notthing to build a decent article. Ashnard Talk Contribs 17:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Please, if he is as notable as you say, please find some third-party sources that comment on Marth extensively to support your argument. Thanks. Ashnard Talk Contribs 19:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia where only certain information is allowed. Adolf Hitler would be proud of TTN. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.248.8.244 (
talk)
01:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Ashnard is the only person who thinks this article isn't notable enough to exist, so let's just ignore him. Wikipedia is about expanding knowledge, not cutting it down and merging articles with others (which only serves to make finding the information harder, because Wikipedia's search function sucks)
Is deleting shit completely to turn it into a 1-2 sentence bit on some other page helping to improve wikipedia? This makes absolutely no sense at all, wtf
wikipedia is supposed to be about having information on EVERYTHING, not just saying "piss off, the thing you were going to write about isn't important enough for us"
This Assnerd guy is pretty much an asshole m i rite?
I was going to use Wikipedia for my Presidential campaign, but now that it has an article dedicated to Marth, I'm gonna have to pass. It really does hurt Wikipedia's already established and well-known credibility. - HClinton42 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.234.100.199 ( talk) 01:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Not enough material for an article? This article proves you wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.88.197 ( talk) 01:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Cut the personal attacks please. Ashnard, I am unsure, by the way, whether the article up for merge here warrants merging. It seems a notable character to me, because of the role the character played in popularising the whole series in the English-speaking world. That information doesn't really belong on this article (as it's about another game!), so where would you put it? User:Krator ( t c) 13:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Ashnard, the only person who wants to reduce the amount of information on Wikipedia is you. What on earth would the benefit be of cutting down the wealth of information that Wikipedia has and making it harder for somebody to find what little information is left? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.204.136.139 ( talk) 15:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
I just threw this together really quick to show the necessary information. I don't know about the quality of everything, but it should be close to the final result. TTN ( talk) 15:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
TTN, your version just about sums up the necessary points, although it may need to be altered slightly so it's within the context of a characters section, because that reads a bit more like a lead. Still great, just needs to be from the viewpoint of this game a bit more if it's merged into this article. Thanks. Ashnard Talk Contribs 08:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Regardless of consensus or not we are strictly not allowed to merge any episodes or character information as per an arbcom injunction. I'm not taking a side just telling everyone to wait until arbcom is over. -- Sin Harvest ( talk) 10:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
While playing Smash Bros. Brawl last night, I unlocked the sticker for the Fire Emblem character "Shiida" as opposed to "Sheeda." Should we consider "Shiida" the official spelling of the character's name for now? Given that the Fire Emblem DS game is a remake and all characters from this game will appear in FEDS, should we adjust the naming as we know more, or wait until FEDS is released with an English translation?-- 75.92.186.211 ( talk) 02:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Speaking of which, I think Ricard's name (リカード Rikādo) should be listed in the Character name list as "Ricardo". I mean, yeah, that name exists in the English world, so why not list his name as Ricardo? 168.12.253.66 ( talk) 20:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Is the DS remake ( Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon) independently notable from the original Famicom/NES ( Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light)? George Ho ( talk) 03:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 21:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: IDV ( talk · contribs) 23:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I'll be back with a review soon, at latest on Monday but probably before that.-- IDV talk 23:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)