![]() | Stanley Kubrick filmography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Stanley Kubrick filmography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Stanley Kubrick was copied or moved into Filmography and awards of Stanley Kubrick with this edit on May 30, 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Should the razzies here be mentioned? It's a joke organization that I don't think takes themselves too serious. - Xcuref1endx ( talk) 02:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Awards have to go to a separate page. They are a different subject with different categories at the bottom of the page. - Salarabdolmohamadian ( talk) 23:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
With
this edit, Editor
SNUGGUMS added italic markup to |work=
in this citation with the edit summary cancel out italics within "work" parameter
:
{{cite news|url=https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/spartacus|title=Spartacus|work=''Golden Globe Awards''|publisher=Hollywood Foreign Press Association|access-date=January 7, 2021|archive-date=March 23, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323072331/https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/spartacus|url-status=live}}
{{
cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)As you can see, that change does nothing to the rendering of the citation except to cause the template to emit the error message: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
. As part of the error message, the template also included this article in
Category:CS1 errors: markup which is where I discovered it.
With
this edit, I removed the italic markup and thus removed the error message and category. Fifty-one minutes later, Editor
HAL333
reverted my edit with the edit summary This was intentional...
. Not at all clear to me what that intention is because italic markup in |work=
is ignored and causes error messaging in reference lists. Don't do that.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 23:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
is a better template for this citation because Golden Globe Awards is not a news source but is a source very specific to the business of the Golden Globes, to the awards themselves, to the awards' history, etc.|publisher=
to avoid italic styling associated with the various |work=
parameters, does a disservice to those readers who consume our citations using metadata readers. The various 'periodical' templates ({{
cite journal}}
, {{
cite magazine}}
, {{cite news}}
) plus {{cite web}}
, do not support |publisher=
in their metadata outputs because the metadata standard adopted long long ago does not support publisher metadata for periodicals.{{cite web |url=https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/spartacus |title=Spartacus |website=Golden Globe Awards |publisher=Hollywood Foreign Press Association |access-date=January 7, 2021 |archive-date=March 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323072331/https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/spartacus |url-status=live}}
An uncredited lighting design role in a filmography? What are we doing here? Do we know what a director’s filmography is? 2603:8001:9F03:51D8:55FF:D247:6641:8754 ( talk) 16:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
As was brought up in the previous section, the listing of The Spy Who Loved Me is absolutely pointless. Look up the clip of Ken Adams talking about it: he helped set up lights (according to him) for four hours. Filmmakers give advice to other filmmakers all the time, hardly means he worked on the film, he just assisted a colleague. Albert Brooks tells a story of Kubrick ringing him up and asking him about the relationship in Modern Romance which they talked about for hours. Should we add "Uncredited relationship consultant" on Eyes Wide Shut to Brooks' page? I don't think so and I don't think The Spy Who Loved Me should be listed here either. Also here's Katharina Kubrick on reddit saying Adams account isn't entirely accurate and Kubrick solely suggested to use natural lighting, a far cry away from being a complete "Lighting designer" https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/8vajeu/the_spy_who_loved_me_and_kubrick/ . Now this gets more into "he said, she said" territory, but with contradicting accounts like this I imagine it's just best not to list it (e.g. you don't see Spielberg listed as an uncredited director of Poltergeist on his page). TDFan1000 ( talk) 00:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Rather than him supposedly being upset with competing with Spielberg on a holocaust movie, makes more sense that he would have been depressed by the thought of perpetrating another fraud as was the Apollo Moon Landing movie. It’s clear in his interview that he was uncomfortable with that coverup,,, 208.77.180.224 ( talk) 12:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Stanley Kubrick filmography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Stanley Kubrick filmography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Stanley Kubrick was copied or moved into Filmography and awards of Stanley Kubrick with this edit on May 30, 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Should the razzies here be mentioned? It's a joke organization that I don't think takes themselves too serious. - Xcuref1endx ( talk) 02:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Awards have to go to a separate page. They are a different subject with different categories at the bottom of the page. - Salarabdolmohamadian ( talk) 23:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
With
this edit, Editor
SNUGGUMS added italic markup to |work=
in this citation with the edit summary cancel out italics within "work" parameter
:
{{cite news|url=https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/spartacus|title=Spartacus|work=''Golden Globe Awards''|publisher=Hollywood Foreign Press Association|access-date=January 7, 2021|archive-date=March 23, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323072331/https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/spartacus|url-status=live}}
{{
cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)As you can see, that change does nothing to the rendering of the citation except to cause the template to emit the error message: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
. As part of the error message, the template also included this article in
Category:CS1 errors: markup which is where I discovered it.
With
this edit, I removed the italic markup and thus removed the error message and category. Fifty-one minutes later, Editor
HAL333
reverted my edit with the edit summary This was intentional...
. Not at all clear to me what that intention is because italic markup in |work=
is ignored and causes error messaging in reference lists. Don't do that.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 23:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
is a better template for this citation because Golden Globe Awards is not a news source but is a source very specific to the business of the Golden Globes, to the awards themselves, to the awards' history, etc.|publisher=
to avoid italic styling associated with the various |work=
parameters, does a disservice to those readers who consume our citations using metadata readers. The various 'periodical' templates ({{
cite journal}}
, {{
cite magazine}}
, {{cite news}}
) plus {{cite web}}
, do not support |publisher=
in their metadata outputs because the metadata standard adopted long long ago does not support publisher metadata for periodicals.{{cite web |url=https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/spartacus |title=Spartacus |website=Golden Globe Awards |publisher=Hollywood Foreign Press Association |access-date=January 7, 2021 |archive-date=March 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323072331/https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/spartacus |url-status=live}}
An uncredited lighting design role in a filmography? What are we doing here? Do we know what a director’s filmography is? 2603:8001:9F03:51D8:55FF:D247:6641:8754 ( talk) 16:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
As was brought up in the previous section, the listing of The Spy Who Loved Me is absolutely pointless. Look up the clip of Ken Adams talking about it: he helped set up lights (according to him) for four hours. Filmmakers give advice to other filmmakers all the time, hardly means he worked on the film, he just assisted a colleague. Albert Brooks tells a story of Kubrick ringing him up and asking him about the relationship in Modern Romance which they talked about for hours. Should we add "Uncredited relationship consultant" on Eyes Wide Shut to Brooks' page? I don't think so and I don't think The Spy Who Loved Me should be listed here either. Also here's Katharina Kubrick on reddit saying Adams account isn't entirely accurate and Kubrick solely suggested to use natural lighting, a far cry away from being a complete "Lighting designer" https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/8vajeu/the_spy_who_loved_me_and_kubrick/ . Now this gets more into "he said, she said" territory, but with contradicting accounts like this I imagine it's just best not to list it (e.g. you don't see Spielberg listed as an uncredited director of Poltergeist on his page). TDFan1000 ( talk) 00:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Rather than him supposedly being upset with competing with Spielberg on a holocaust movie, makes more sense that he would have been depressed by the thought of perpetrating another fraud as was the Apollo Moon Landing movie. It’s clear in his interview that he was uncomfortable with that coverup,,, 208.77.180.224 ( talk) 12:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)