This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fifty Shades of Grey (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Fifty Shades of Grey was copied or moved into Fifty Shades of Grey (film) with this edit on 07:10, 12 August 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 5 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Anybody else feel a page protection for this page? Vandalism continues from users whom aren't fan of the series which in turn is hate speech. Callmemirela ( talk) 00:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Is there any evidence Fifty Shades Darker and Fifty Shades Freed been made into films as well?-- 58.7.80.222 ( talk) 16:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Well there is now.-- 106.68.23.249 ( talk) 03:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Rachel Skarsten is part of the cast as Andrea. Can you please include her in the cast list? thanks Tainteddd ( talk) 08:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Worth forking the soundtrack content to Fifty Shades of Grey (soundtrack)? Two singles have already been released and the album contains many notable artists and tracks. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Boots is a featured artist on the 2014 version of Crazy in Love. Also, Shawn "Jay Z" Carter only wrote his verse in the original version, so he should be taken out as a writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.153.112.134 ( talk) 15:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Should we include ratings from other countries or just leave it to USA and/or Canada? Callmemirela ( talk) 00:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On February 4, it is revealed that the film will not be shown in cinemas in Malaysia. The film was banned by the Film Censorship Board of Malaysia for being unfit for the Malaysian audience, calling the flick more like "pornography than a movie". "The board made a decision in view of the film containing scenes that are not of natural sexual content. The content is more sadistic, featuring scenes of a woman being tied to a bed and whipped," [chairman] Abdul Halim said. [1]
Before I start content dispute, I would like to know why the controversy section has its own section. Please view The Hunger Games (film). The controversy has its own subsection and it is based on the movie. Please clarify this before I make changes once more. Plus, someone edit what I had done, which to how I previously left it. Callmemirela ( talk) 02:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
I've been having some difficulty with Callmemirela, who has been engaging in blanket edit reversions on the basis that "some of your edits don't meet the grammar of the English language (sic)". Mr Callmemirela has invited me to start a discussion about his reversions. He is evidently not a native English speaker and is mistaken in his assertion that the edits are ungrammatical. It would be nice if Mr. Callmemirela would be more restrained with his reversions.
"The film received mixed reviews from critics."
think it's fair to mention mostly negative. with a 4.2/10 rotten tomatoes and 47/100 metacritic, it's tough to say mix reviews with a straight face. mixed in the sense the reviews range from "it sucked" to "it didn't suck as much as i expected."
for comparison sake, spooky doll movie
Annabelle sucked less and article does not sugar coat that majority opinion holds it sucked.
63.197.119.253 (
talk)
19:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
100% agree - ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.230.30.42 ( talk) 10:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
NVM, looks like it's moving towards that based on recent updates. 63.197.119.253 ( talk) 19:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
This film has been universally panned by critics. 26% is lower than many of the heralded bombs like the Lone Ranger, yet the Critical Reception author spent far more time on the few positive critic's rreviews and a short paragraph barely mentioning the countless critics who denounced the film. Be objective, report the facts and the truth. This is not a press junkett for E.L.James or Universal pictures. If it's 74% negative reviews, you should have your content reflect that 3 to 1 - its not your job to sway arguments , its your job to present the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6:1D82:4490:DD25:C4C3:CBAA:FD65 ( talk) 21:11, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
26% - 4.2/10 average. How much worse do you want a film to be & how far do you have to reach to find a half-decent review for you to declare it 'Universal'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6:1D82:4490:DD25:C4C3:CBAA:FD65 ( talk) 21:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment - Regarding reception summary, it should only be added once all reviews are in; It appears as though the reception has settled, so, Rotten Tomatoes's average score is just below 5/10, and Metacritic indicates "mixed or average reviews". The majority of top critics gave it mixed reviews, so I would go with the Metacritic consensus, or mixed-to-negative, although I know some editors dislike using "mixed to". -- Lapadite ( talk) 01:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
The score has now dropped to 24% on rotten tomatoes so that needs to be changed, and that score means it is universally negative. Also 90% of the other negative reviews are left out of the critical reception article. I can provide many sources to prove this, the film should not have 'mixed' but generally negative. The reception on this page is not objective at all, it's like editors are trying theur best to put the film in a more positive light. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamthetruecreator ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I definitely can't agree with Betty Logan that Rottentomatoes qualifies positive reviews as "fresh" and all 'not positive, be they negative or mixed or neutral' as rotten. Let's compare the values of Pearl Harbor and Fifty Shades of Grey on Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic and in our judgment:
Criterion | Pearl Harbor | Fifty Shades of Grey |
---|---|---|
RT "fresh" percentage | 25% | 25% |
RT rating | 4.6 | 4.2 |
RT audience score | 67% | 49% |
RT consensus | "...a tedious romance filled with laughably bad dialogue... the action sequence is spectacular though." | "While creatively better endowed than [the book] ... a less than satisfying experience on the screen." |
MC Metascore | 44% | 46% |
MC Critic Reviews positive:negative | 9:6 | 9:8 |
MC User Reviews positive:negative | 39:28 | 48:46 |
MC User Score | 5.8 | 4.0 |
Wikipedia concludes: Reviews were... | "mostly negative", "very negative" | "mixed" |
This is clearly extremely inconsistent. Even "mixed to negative" appears flattering in comparison, however <corr>not</corr> mentioning the term "negative" should be out of question. -- KnightMove ( talk) 10:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article states that the movie opened in North America simultaneously, and then it lists the opening dates in countries outside North America. The page incorrectly list Mexico as one of the countries outside North America. Please note that Mexico is part of North America, and errors like this one are very misleading to students (I am a geography teacher). You may write U.S. and Canada as opposed to using North America is these cases. Thank you 76.185.56.74 ( talk) 17:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
The "Opposition campaign" section starts : "On January 28, 2014, a campaign in the United States ... ". However, based on the reference, the real date is "January 28, 2015". 190.248.157.242 ( talk) 18:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
68.192.51.118 ( talk) 23:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Anastasia "Ana" Steele is a 21-year-old college senior attending Washington State University in Vancouver, Washington with her best friend Katherine "Kate" Kavanagh, who writes for the student newspaper. Due to an illness, Kate persuades Ana to take her place and interview 27-year-old Christian Grey, an incredibly successful and wealthy young entrepreneur in Seattle. Ana is instantly attracted to Christian, but also finds him intimidating. As a result, she stumbles through the interview asking questions about his personal life and relationships and leaves Christian's office believing that it went badly. Ana tries to console herself thinking the two of them will probably never meet again. However, she is surprised when Christian appears at Clayton's, the largest independent hardware store in the Portland area, where she works. While he purchases various items including cable ties, masking tape and rope, Ana informs Christian that Kate would like some photographs to go along with her article about him. Christian leaves Ana with his phone number. Later that day, Kate urges Ana to call Christian and arrange a photo shoot with their photographer friend, José Rodriguez.
The next day José, Kate, and Ana arrive for the photo shoot at the Heathman Hotel where Christian is staying and Christian asks Ana out for coffee. The two talk over coffee and Christian asks Ana if she's dating anyone, specifically José. When Ana replies that she isn't dating anyone, Christian begins to ask her about her family. During the conversation, Ana learns that Christian is also single, but is not "a hearts and flowers kind of guy". This "warning" intrigues Ana, especially after he pulls her out of the path of an oncoming cyclist. However, Ana believes that she is not attractive enough for Christian, much to the chagrin of Kate. After finishing her exams, Ana receives a package from Christian containing first edition copies of Tess of the d'Urbervilles, which stuns her. Later that night, Ana goes out drinking with her friends and ends up drunk dialing Christian, who informs her that he will be coming to pick her up because of her inebriated state. Ana goes outside to get some fresh air, and José attempts to kiss her, but he is stopped by Christian's arrival. Ana leaves with Christian, but not before she discovers that Kate has been flirting with Christian's brother, Elliot. Later, Ana wakes to find herself in Christian's hotel room, where he scolds her for not taking proper care of herself. Christian then reveals that he would like to have sex with her. He initially says that Ana will first have to fill out paperwork, but later goes back on this statement after making out with her in the elevator.
Ana goes on a date with Christian where he takes her in his helicopter, Charlie Tango, to his apartment. Once there, Christian insists that she sign a non-disclosure agreement forbidding her to discuss anything that they do together, which Ana agrees to sign. He also mentions other paperwork, but first takes her to his playroom full of BDSM toys and gear. There Christian informs her that the second contract will be one of dominance and submission and that there will be no romantic relationship, only a sexual one. The contract even forbids Ana from touching Christian or making eye contact with him. At this point, Christian realizes that Ana is a virgin and agrees to take her virginity without making her sign the contract. The two then have sex. The following morning, Ana and Christian once again have sex. His mother then arrives moments after their sexual encounter, and is surprised by the meeting, having previously thought Christian was homosexual because he was never seen with a woman. Christian later takes Ana out to eat, and he reveals to her that he lost his virginity at fifteen to one of his mother's friends, Elena Lincoln, and that his previous dominant/submissive relationships (Christian reveals that in his first dominant/submissive relationship he was the submissive) failed due to incompatibility. They plan to meet up again and Christian takes Ana home, where she discovers several job offers and admits to Kate that she and Christian had sex.
Over the next few days, Ana receives several packages from Christian. These include a laptop to enable her to perform research on the BDSM lifestyle in consideration of the contract as well as for the two of them to communicate, since she has never previously owned a computer, and a more detailed version of the dominant/submissive contract. She and Christian email each other, with Ana teasing him and refusing to honor parts of the contract, such as only eating foods from a specific list. Ana later meets up with Christian to discuss the contract, only to grow overwhelmed by the potential BDSM arrangement and the potential of having a sexual relationship with Christian that is not romantic in nature. Because of these feelings, Ana runs away from Christian and does not see him again until her college graduation, where he is a guest speaker. During this time, Ana agrees to sign the dominant/submissive contract. Ana and Christian once again meet up to further discuss the contract, and they go over Ana's hard and soft limits. Ana is spanked for the first time by Christian; the experience leaves her both enticed and slightly confused. This confusion is exacerbated by Christian's lavish gifts, and the fact that he brings her to meet his family. The two continue with the arrangement without Ana having yet signed the contract. After successfully landing a job with Seattle Independent Publishing (SIP), Ana further bristles under the restrictions of the non-disclosure agreement and the complex relationship with Christian. The tension between Ana and Christian eventually comes to a head after Ana asks Christian to punish her in order to show her how extreme a BDSM relationship with him could be. Christian fulfills Ana's request, beating her with a belt, only for Ana to realize that the two of them are incompatible. Devastated, Ana leaves Christian and returns to the apartment she shares with Kate.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The film became the record-holder for highest-grossing opening weekend ever in Hungary with 244.4 million Ft (admission: 182,165) taking over from Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith (229,4 million / 244,440).
Varga Dénes (February 16, 2015). "Rekordott döntött a magyar mozikban A szürke ötven árnyalata". ORIGO.
145.90.66.110 ( talk) 14:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.
Callmemirela (
talk)
23:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
He states" I fuck hard I don't make love" They fuck in various places throughout the movie. She catches feelings. He almost falls in love. He kicks her out of bed to sleep by herself cause he ain't with that cuddle shit. He too eventually starts catching feelings not before he catches himself and tells Ana " i dont't romance." He confesses he was spanked by his dominant and now he wants to be "the punisher" and states"his time as come." Anastasia all curious say"lets..."
They proceed to the play room, no xbox, and he spanks the shit out of her 6 times. Then she realizes that this asshole is a psychopath to which she runs away from but not before she says "christian" in the elevator - random sequence.
Not done Unfortunately, this would spank the shit out of the article's credibility.
Popcornduff (
talk)
21:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Idfwu101 ( talk) 23:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC) When Anastasia Steele, a literature student, goes to interview the wealthy Christian Grey, as a favor to her roommate Kate Kavanagh, she encounters a beautiful, brilliant and intimidating man. The innocent and naive Ana started to realize she wants him, despite his enigmatic reserve and advice, she finds herself desperate to get close to him. Not able to resist Ana's beauty and independent spirit, Christian Grey admits he wants her too, but in his own terms. Ana hesitates as she discovers the singular tastes of Christian Grey - despite the embellishments of success, his multinational businesses, his vast wealth, his loving family - Grey is consumed by the need to control everything.
This is an intentionally toned down version of the plot to at least provide a short synopsis of the narrative of the film without embellishment. Please try to follow this toned down version for at least a week or two while reaction to the film becomes more graded and circumspect. For the next week or two try to maintain the tone to this low-key version until the press reviews suggest working options for the future of maintaining this plot section.
This is deliberately a low key summary of the plot, and changes to reflect details of plot should be discussed on the Talk page for at least the next week or two until more press reviews and press summaries become available. LawrencePrincipe ( talk) 23:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
This section regards all participating users. We are all well aware that edit warring and content dispute has occurred on the article about the overall critical reception. As no one seems wanting to discuss this issue on the talk page and edit war (as well as other issues that can be handled), I think it is time we discuss about the idea of a full page protection or pending changes. It is obvious we will have to test it out and see how it continues to do. The current page protection is due to expire on the 20th February, and I am not risking to be overloaded with edits by IPs and users changing the overall critical reception then RPPing again. Please discuss this matter before requesting. Consensus is needed. Thank you, Callmemirela ( talk) 00:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Dakota Johnson's acting was mostly praised, for example. Say it was "highly criticised" is very inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.40.82.211 ( talk) 09:55, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Now that Fifty Shades of Grey has been nominated for a series of major film and music awards (including several Grammy Award nominations) I suggest a chart of nominations is added to the article. I have provided one below, but feel free to add your own contributions to it if it's necessary.
Awards | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Award | Category | Recipients and nominees | Result | |
Grammy Awards | Best Compilation Soundtrack for Visual Media | Fifty Shades of Grey: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack | Pending | |
Best Song Written for Visual Media | Savan Kotecha, Max Martin, Tove Lo, Ali Payami and Ilya Salmanzadeh for " Love Me like You Do" | Pending | ||
Ahmad Balshe, Stephan Moccio, Jason Queenneville and Abel Tesfaye for " Earned It" | Pending | |||
Best R&B Song | Pending | |||
Best Pop Solo Performance | Ellie Goulding for "Love Me like You Do" | Pending | ||
Best R&B Performance | The Weeknd for "Earned It" | Pending | ||
People's Choice Awards | Favorite Dramatic Movie | Fifty Shades of Grey | Pending | |
Favorite Dramatic Movie Actress | Dakota Johnson | Pending | ||
Satellite Awards | Best Original Song | "Love Me like You Do" | Pending |
-- 190.194.10.18 ( talk) 21:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
-- 190.194.10.18 ( talk) 17:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
In the second paragraph of the plot it says:
That's a judgment
Then:
I didn't see concern. If anything it was a stranger overstepping the mark, interfering and possibly controlling. Yes, a personal interpretation/judgment. As is saying concerned.
Unless there's a ref.
Dannman ( talk) 20:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
I've done the edit. Dannman ( talk) 16:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fifty Shades of Grey (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fifty Shades of Grey (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.fashionnstyle.com/articles/12524/20131021/christian-grey-casting-madness-shirtless-scott-eastwood-vs-francois-arnaud-50-shades-grey-movie-actor-hints-rumors-twitter-2014-trailer-release-date-jeopardy.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fifty Shades of Grey (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fifty Shades of Grey (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Fifty Shades of Grey was copied or moved into Fifty Shades of Grey (film) with this edit on 07:10, 12 August 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 5 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Anybody else feel a page protection for this page? Vandalism continues from users whom aren't fan of the series which in turn is hate speech. Callmemirela ( talk) 00:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Is there any evidence Fifty Shades Darker and Fifty Shades Freed been made into films as well?-- 58.7.80.222 ( talk) 16:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Well there is now.-- 106.68.23.249 ( talk) 03:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Rachel Skarsten is part of the cast as Andrea. Can you please include her in the cast list? thanks Tainteddd ( talk) 08:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Worth forking the soundtrack content to Fifty Shades of Grey (soundtrack)? Two singles have already been released and the album contains many notable artists and tracks. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Boots is a featured artist on the 2014 version of Crazy in Love. Also, Shawn "Jay Z" Carter only wrote his verse in the original version, so he should be taken out as a writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.153.112.134 ( talk) 15:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Should we include ratings from other countries or just leave it to USA and/or Canada? Callmemirela ( talk) 00:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On February 4, it is revealed that the film will not be shown in cinemas in Malaysia. The film was banned by the Film Censorship Board of Malaysia for being unfit for the Malaysian audience, calling the flick more like "pornography than a movie". "The board made a decision in view of the film containing scenes that are not of natural sexual content. The content is more sadistic, featuring scenes of a woman being tied to a bed and whipped," [chairman] Abdul Halim said. [1]
Before I start content dispute, I would like to know why the controversy section has its own section. Please view The Hunger Games (film). The controversy has its own subsection and it is based on the movie. Please clarify this before I make changes once more. Plus, someone edit what I had done, which to how I previously left it. Callmemirela ( talk) 02:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
I've been having some difficulty with Callmemirela, who has been engaging in blanket edit reversions on the basis that "some of your edits don't meet the grammar of the English language (sic)". Mr Callmemirela has invited me to start a discussion about his reversions. He is evidently not a native English speaker and is mistaken in his assertion that the edits are ungrammatical. It would be nice if Mr. Callmemirela would be more restrained with his reversions.
"The film received mixed reviews from critics."
think it's fair to mention mostly negative. with a 4.2/10 rotten tomatoes and 47/100 metacritic, it's tough to say mix reviews with a straight face. mixed in the sense the reviews range from "it sucked" to "it didn't suck as much as i expected."
for comparison sake, spooky doll movie
Annabelle sucked less and article does not sugar coat that majority opinion holds it sucked.
63.197.119.253 (
talk)
19:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
100% agree - ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.230.30.42 ( talk) 10:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
NVM, looks like it's moving towards that based on recent updates. 63.197.119.253 ( talk) 19:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
This film has been universally panned by critics. 26% is lower than many of the heralded bombs like the Lone Ranger, yet the Critical Reception author spent far more time on the few positive critic's rreviews and a short paragraph barely mentioning the countless critics who denounced the film. Be objective, report the facts and the truth. This is not a press junkett for E.L.James or Universal pictures. If it's 74% negative reviews, you should have your content reflect that 3 to 1 - its not your job to sway arguments , its your job to present the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6:1D82:4490:DD25:C4C3:CBAA:FD65 ( talk) 21:11, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
26% - 4.2/10 average. How much worse do you want a film to be & how far do you have to reach to find a half-decent review for you to declare it 'Universal'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6:1D82:4490:DD25:C4C3:CBAA:FD65 ( talk) 21:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment - Regarding reception summary, it should only be added once all reviews are in; It appears as though the reception has settled, so, Rotten Tomatoes's average score is just below 5/10, and Metacritic indicates "mixed or average reviews". The majority of top critics gave it mixed reviews, so I would go with the Metacritic consensus, or mixed-to-negative, although I know some editors dislike using "mixed to". -- Lapadite ( talk) 01:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
The score has now dropped to 24% on rotten tomatoes so that needs to be changed, and that score means it is universally negative. Also 90% of the other negative reviews are left out of the critical reception article. I can provide many sources to prove this, the film should not have 'mixed' but generally negative. The reception on this page is not objective at all, it's like editors are trying theur best to put the film in a more positive light. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamthetruecreator ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I definitely can't agree with Betty Logan that Rottentomatoes qualifies positive reviews as "fresh" and all 'not positive, be they negative or mixed or neutral' as rotten. Let's compare the values of Pearl Harbor and Fifty Shades of Grey on Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic and in our judgment:
Criterion | Pearl Harbor | Fifty Shades of Grey |
---|---|---|
RT "fresh" percentage | 25% | 25% |
RT rating | 4.6 | 4.2 |
RT audience score | 67% | 49% |
RT consensus | "...a tedious romance filled with laughably bad dialogue... the action sequence is spectacular though." | "While creatively better endowed than [the book] ... a less than satisfying experience on the screen." |
MC Metascore | 44% | 46% |
MC Critic Reviews positive:negative | 9:6 | 9:8 |
MC User Reviews positive:negative | 39:28 | 48:46 |
MC User Score | 5.8 | 4.0 |
Wikipedia concludes: Reviews were... | "mostly negative", "very negative" | "mixed" |
This is clearly extremely inconsistent. Even "mixed to negative" appears flattering in comparison, however <corr>not</corr> mentioning the term "negative" should be out of question. -- KnightMove ( talk) 10:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article states that the movie opened in North America simultaneously, and then it lists the opening dates in countries outside North America. The page incorrectly list Mexico as one of the countries outside North America. Please note that Mexico is part of North America, and errors like this one are very misleading to students (I am a geography teacher). You may write U.S. and Canada as opposed to using North America is these cases. Thank you 76.185.56.74 ( talk) 17:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
The "Opposition campaign" section starts : "On January 28, 2014, a campaign in the United States ... ". However, based on the reference, the real date is "January 28, 2015". 190.248.157.242 ( talk) 18:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
68.192.51.118 ( talk) 23:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Anastasia "Ana" Steele is a 21-year-old college senior attending Washington State University in Vancouver, Washington with her best friend Katherine "Kate" Kavanagh, who writes for the student newspaper. Due to an illness, Kate persuades Ana to take her place and interview 27-year-old Christian Grey, an incredibly successful and wealthy young entrepreneur in Seattle. Ana is instantly attracted to Christian, but also finds him intimidating. As a result, she stumbles through the interview asking questions about his personal life and relationships and leaves Christian's office believing that it went badly. Ana tries to console herself thinking the two of them will probably never meet again. However, she is surprised when Christian appears at Clayton's, the largest independent hardware store in the Portland area, where she works. While he purchases various items including cable ties, masking tape and rope, Ana informs Christian that Kate would like some photographs to go along with her article about him. Christian leaves Ana with his phone number. Later that day, Kate urges Ana to call Christian and arrange a photo shoot with their photographer friend, José Rodriguez.
The next day José, Kate, and Ana arrive for the photo shoot at the Heathman Hotel where Christian is staying and Christian asks Ana out for coffee. The two talk over coffee and Christian asks Ana if she's dating anyone, specifically José. When Ana replies that she isn't dating anyone, Christian begins to ask her about her family. During the conversation, Ana learns that Christian is also single, but is not "a hearts and flowers kind of guy". This "warning" intrigues Ana, especially after he pulls her out of the path of an oncoming cyclist. However, Ana believes that she is not attractive enough for Christian, much to the chagrin of Kate. After finishing her exams, Ana receives a package from Christian containing first edition copies of Tess of the d'Urbervilles, which stuns her. Later that night, Ana goes out drinking with her friends and ends up drunk dialing Christian, who informs her that he will be coming to pick her up because of her inebriated state. Ana goes outside to get some fresh air, and José attempts to kiss her, but he is stopped by Christian's arrival. Ana leaves with Christian, but not before she discovers that Kate has been flirting with Christian's brother, Elliot. Later, Ana wakes to find herself in Christian's hotel room, where he scolds her for not taking proper care of herself. Christian then reveals that he would like to have sex with her. He initially says that Ana will first have to fill out paperwork, but later goes back on this statement after making out with her in the elevator.
Ana goes on a date with Christian where he takes her in his helicopter, Charlie Tango, to his apartment. Once there, Christian insists that she sign a non-disclosure agreement forbidding her to discuss anything that they do together, which Ana agrees to sign. He also mentions other paperwork, but first takes her to his playroom full of BDSM toys and gear. There Christian informs her that the second contract will be one of dominance and submission and that there will be no romantic relationship, only a sexual one. The contract even forbids Ana from touching Christian or making eye contact with him. At this point, Christian realizes that Ana is a virgin and agrees to take her virginity without making her sign the contract. The two then have sex. The following morning, Ana and Christian once again have sex. His mother then arrives moments after their sexual encounter, and is surprised by the meeting, having previously thought Christian was homosexual because he was never seen with a woman. Christian later takes Ana out to eat, and he reveals to her that he lost his virginity at fifteen to one of his mother's friends, Elena Lincoln, and that his previous dominant/submissive relationships (Christian reveals that in his first dominant/submissive relationship he was the submissive) failed due to incompatibility. They plan to meet up again and Christian takes Ana home, where she discovers several job offers and admits to Kate that she and Christian had sex.
Over the next few days, Ana receives several packages from Christian. These include a laptop to enable her to perform research on the BDSM lifestyle in consideration of the contract as well as for the two of them to communicate, since she has never previously owned a computer, and a more detailed version of the dominant/submissive contract. She and Christian email each other, with Ana teasing him and refusing to honor parts of the contract, such as only eating foods from a specific list. Ana later meets up with Christian to discuss the contract, only to grow overwhelmed by the potential BDSM arrangement and the potential of having a sexual relationship with Christian that is not romantic in nature. Because of these feelings, Ana runs away from Christian and does not see him again until her college graduation, where he is a guest speaker. During this time, Ana agrees to sign the dominant/submissive contract. Ana and Christian once again meet up to further discuss the contract, and they go over Ana's hard and soft limits. Ana is spanked for the first time by Christian; the experience leaves her both enticed and slightly confused. This confusion is exacerbated by Christian's lavish gifts, and the fact that he brings her to meet his family. The two continue with the arrangement without Ana having yet signed the contract. After successfully landing a job with Seattle Independent Publishing (SIP), Ana further bristles under the restrictions of the non-disclosure agreement and the complex relationship with Christian. The tension between Ana and Christian eventually comes to a head after Ana asks Christian to punish her in order to show her how extreme a BDSM relationship with him could be. Christian fulfills Ana's request, beating her with a belt, only for Ana to realize that the two of them are incompatible. Devastated, Ana leaves Christian and returns to the apartment she shares with Kate.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The film became the record-holder for highest-grossing opening weekend ever in Hungary with 244.4 million Ft (admission: 182,165) taking over from Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith (229,4 million / 244,440).
Varga Dénes (February 16, 2015). "Rekordott döntött a magyar mozikban A szürke ötven árnyalata". ORIGO.
145.90.66.110 ( talk) 14:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.
Callmemirela (
talk)
23:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
He states" I fuck hard I don't make love" They fuck in various places throughout the movie. She catches feelings. He almost falls in love. He kicks her out of bed to sleep by herself cause he ain't with that cuddle shit. He too eventually starts catching feelings not before he catches himself and tells Ana " i dont't romance." He confesses he was spanked by his dominant and now he wants to be "the punisher" and states"his time as come." Anastasia all curious say"lets..."
They proceed to the play room, no xbox, and he spanks the shit out of her 6 times. Then she realizes that this asshole is a psychopath to which she runs away from but not before she says "christian" in the elevator - random sequence.
Not done Unfortunately, this would spank the shit out of the article's credibility.
Popcornduff (
talk)
21:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Idfwu101 ( talk) 23:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC) When Anastasia Steele, a literature student, goes to interview the wealthy Christian Grey, as a favor to her roommate Kate Kavanagh, she encounters a beautiful, brilliant and intimidating man. The innocent and naive Ana started to realize she wants him, despite his enigmatic reserve and advice, she finds herself desperate to get close to him. Not able to resist Ana's beauty and independent spirit, Christian Grey admits he wants her too, but in his own terms. Ana hesitates as she discovers the singular tastes of Christian Grey - despite the embellishments of success, his multinational businesses, his vast wealth, his loving family - Grey is consumed by the need to control everything.
This is an intentionally toned down version of the plot to at least provide a short synopsis of the narrative of the film without embellishment. Please try to follow this toned down version for at least a week or two while reaction to the film becomes more graded and circumspect. For the next week or two try to maintain the tone to this low-key version until the press reviews suggest working options for the future of maintaining this plot section.
This is deliberately a low key summary of the plot, and changes to reflect details of plot should be discussed on the Talk page for at least the next week or two until more press reviews and press summaries become available. LawrencePrincipe ( talk) 23:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
This section regards all participating users. We are all well aware that edit warring and content dispute has occurred on the article about the overall critical reception. As no one seems wanting to discuss this issue on the talk page and edit war (as well as other issues that can be handled), I think it is time we discuss about the idea of a full page protection or pending changes. It is obvious we will have to test it out and see how it continues to do. The current page protection is due to expire on the 20th February, and I am not risking to be overloaded with edits by IPs and users changing the overall critical reception then RPPing again. Please discuss this matter before requesting. Consensus is needed. Thank you, Callmemirela ( talk) 00:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Dakota Johnson's acting was mostly praised, for example. Say it was "highly criticised" is very inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.40.82.211 ( talk) 09:55, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Now that Fifty Shades of Grey has been nominated for a series of major film and music awards (including several Grammy Award nominations) I suggest a chart of nominations is added to the article. I have provided one below, but feel free to add your own contributions to it if it's necessary.
Awards | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Award | Category | Recipients and nominees | Result | |
Grammy Awards | Best Compilation Soundtrack for Visual Media | Fifty Shades of Grey: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack | Pending | |
Best Song Written for Visual Media | Savan Kotecha, Max Martin, Tove Lo, Ali Payami and Ilya Salmanzadeh for " Love Me like You Do" | Pending | ||
Ahmad Balshe, Stephan Moccio, Jason Queenneville and Abel Tesfaye for " Earned It" | Pending | |||
Best R&B Song | Pending | |||
Best Pop Solo Performance | Ellie Goulding for "Love Me like You Do" | Pending | ||
Best R&B Performance | The Weeknd for "Earned It" | Pending | ||
People's Choice Awards | Favorite Dramatic Movie | Fifty Shades of Grey | Pending | |
Favorite Dramatic Movie Actress | Dakota Johnson | Pending | ||
Satellite Awards | Best Original Song | "Love Me like You Do" | Pending |
-- 190.194.10.18 ( talk) 21:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
-- 190.194.10.18 ( talk) 17:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
In the second paragraph of the plot it says:
That's a judgment
Then:
I didn't see concern. If anything it was a stranger overstepping the mark, interfering and possibly controlling. Yes, a personal interpretation/judgment. As is saying concerned.
Unless there's a ref.
Dannman ( talk) 20:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
I've done the edit. Dannman ( talk) 16:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fifty Shades of Grey (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fifty Shades of Grey (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.fashionnstyle.com/articles/12524/20131021/christian-grey-casting-madness-shirtless-scott-eastwood-vs-francois-arnaud-50-shades-grey-movie-actor-hints-rumors-twitter-2014-trailer-release-date-jeopardy.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fifty Shades of Grey (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)