Nice article. I'm not going to review it because of the obvious COI, but I've run the DOI bot and made some minor edits. Comments
Good luck jimfbleak ( talk) 05:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 30, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Million_Moments ( talk) 17:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Nice article. I'm not going to review it because of the obvious COI, but I've run the DOI bot and made some minor edits. Comments
Good luck jimfbleak ( talk) 05:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 30, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Million_Moments ( talk) 17:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)