![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi there. I want to address some of damiens.r's recent changes.
Damiens.rf, please discuss major edits such as those made last night on this page in the future, especially when you remove multiple reliable sources. Thanks. RMJ ( talk) 13:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, user 58.170.122.2. Thanks for contributing. I understand where you are coming from by adding men - men read Feministing too - but men are not Feministing's primary audience, which is what that referred to. Saying that it is popular among progressive women and men would be like saying it is popular among progressive and conservative young and old women and men. Conservatives, older folks, and men read Feministing, but they are not the primary audience. Young progressive women are the primary audience, as stated by the numerous references to that claim. That is why I reverted your claim, though I appreciate your point! Thank you. RMJ ( talk) 16:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
To include demographic information from Alexa Internet? Novalord2 06:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely. All 37 people who actually regularly visit this blog should be properly categorized. 222.230.128.224 ( talk) 12:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)CynTas
I was surprised to read that feministing hosts
discussions celebrating or encouraging abuse against men
so I followed the citation link and read the page. I found there two comments that may be what the above criticism is referring to:
I think this guy fears castration.
If by "fears" you mean "deserves," then yes.
and
someone please give this guy a copy of mary daly's "gyn/ecology" so his head will explode!!!
It seems to me that characterizing these two isolated comments a discussion doesn't accurately represent what's on the page cited. I'd suggest that it would be more fair to write something along the lines of, "The comments hosted on the site include a small minority that advocate violence against men."
I didn't change the page itself because I'm brand new around here and I'm not sure whether that would constitute an opening volley in an "editing war" and I didn't know whether this particular criticism had been discussed at length already.
-- Dancingsinging ( talk) 16:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Andral ( talk) 17:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Feministing. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Feministing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Feministing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
as of November 2019, Feministing has not seen updates for 8 months. Should we note it to be defunct, or wait until reliable MSM sources come to the same conclusion? Wefa ( talk) 16:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi there. I want to address some of damiens.r's recent changes.
Damiens.rf, please discuss major edits such as those made last night on this page in the future, especially when you remove multiple reliable sources. Thanks. RMJ ( talk) 13:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, user 58.170.122.2. Thanks for contributing. I understand where you are coming from by adding men - men read Feministing too - but men are not Feministing's primary audience, which is what that referred to. Saying that it is popular among progressive women and men would be like saying it is popular among progressive and conservative young and old women and men. Conservatives, older folks, and men read Feministing, but they are not the primary audience. Young progressive women are the primary audience, as stated by the numerous references to that claim. That is why I reverted your claim, though I appreciate your point! Thank you. RMJ ( talk) 16:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
To include demographic information from Alexa Internet? Novalord2 06:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely. All 37 people who actually regularly visit this blog should be properly categorized. 222.230.128.224 ( talk) 12:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)CynTas
I was surprised to read that feministing hosts
discussions celebrating or encouraging abuse against men
so I followed the citation link and read the page. I found there two comments that may be what the above criticism is referring to:
I think this guy fears castration.
If by "fears" you mean "deserves," then yes.
and
someone please give this guy a copy of mary daly's "gyn/ecology" so his head will explode!!!
It seems to me that characterizing these two isolated comments a discussion doesn't accurately represent what's on the page cited. I'd suggest that it would be more fair to write something along the lines of, "The comments hosted on the site include a small minority that advocate violence against men."
I didn't change the page itself because I'm brand new around here and I'm not sure whether that would constitute an opening volley in an "editing war" and I didn't know whether this particular criticism had been discussed at length already.
-- Dancingsinging ( talk) 16:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Andral ( talk) 17:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Feministing. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Feministing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Feministing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
as of November 2019, Feministing has not seen updates for 8 months. Should we note it to be defunct, or wait until reliable MSM sources come to the same conclusion? Wefa ( talk) 16:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)