![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Trawangan.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is a work in progress. Feel free to contribute! Here are some of the readings that we're looking as we're writing:
Wages for Housework: A Woman's Home is not her Castle (1976)
Napplicable ( talk) 21:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
I marked two references as failing verification, and was subsequently reverted in
this diff with the edit summary "The references are correct!" by
Lifeinthetropics. The sources do not mention the term "Feminist urbanism", and do not support the statements they refer to. Van Heeswijk does not say that feminist urbanism examines capital, labor, power, and social injustice through the lens of urban space and produces new urban realities through self-organization, participation, collective ownership, and new forms of sociability
, but describes herself as an instrument that works on self-organization, collective ownership, and new forms of sociability.
Vexations (
talk)
22:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
I've added a source that uses the term "Feminist urbanism" and clarified how the other sources used support the definition provided. Perimeander ( talk) 12:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello wikipedians,
I understand that this is topical focused article on the theory of feminist urbanism. While that certainly is a great academic theory, in practice it is not WP:Mainstream and does not read WP:NPOV. Opinion literature, art, and other works are generally not reliable unbiased references that would contribute to the article topic as previously suggested. I would suggest that this article content be reframed under a WP:NPOV format and then merged onto/with the urbanism page. As it is, the urbanism article itself is short and there are a wide range of urban theories that would be helpful to arrange with the main topic so as not to confuse the reader. At a high level even the urbanism page itself has problems with relying too closely on unreliable or pov sources. Randomeditor1000 ( talk) 16:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Our source cited for the following phrase: "Feminist urbanism accounts for numerous aspects of a community, including transportation, housing, family responsibilities, and housing mobility programs, as these elements of a community are often dealt with by women or most commonly impact households that are headed by women." has been marked as not containing the information in this source. I am going to remove [not in citation given] because this is, in fact, directly from the source (Boyd, Melody (2008). "The Role of Social Networks In Making Housing Choices: The Experience of the Gautreaux Two Residential Mobility Program". Cityscape. 10 (1): 41–63 – via JSTOR.), which reads: "Specifically, family responsibilites, transportation, and social networks are central issues to consider from a feminist urbanism perspective, because these issues largely shape the experiences of the women in their placement neighborhoods," and "Feminist urbanism is particularly relevant in analyzing housing mobility programs." Because the text cited directly mentions how Feminist urbanism is concerned with all of the things listed in this phrase, I believe that it is correct to cite the given source. Is there something about this that is still unclear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perimeander ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
I am a Rice Architecture student who would love to contribute to this article by expanding on the concepts of Feminist Urbanism. I would provide both further information about this theory and examples of how patriarchy has affected and continues to affect the built environment. Moreover, I want to outline the ways in which these patriarchal movements affect women and society at large, and finally provide a larger list of advocates, resources and projects that have been made to improve this situation. I invite you to check my user page for further information on this possible contribution. Ennis Architect ( talk) 00:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Trawangan.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is a work in progress. Feel free to contribute! Here are some of the readings that we're looking as we're writing:
Wages for Housework: A Woman's Home is not her Castle (1976)
Napplicable ( talk) 21:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
I marked two references as failing verification, and was subsequently reverted in
this diff with the edit summary "The references are correct!" by
Lifeinthetropics. The sources do not mention the term "Feminist urbanism", and do not support the statements they refer to. Van Heeswijk does not say that feminist urbanism examines capital, labor, power, and social injustice through the lens of urban space and produces new urban realities through self-organization, participation, collective ownership, and new forms of sociability
, but describes herself as an instrument that works on self-organization, collective ownership, and new forms of sociability.
Vexations (
talk)
22:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
I've added a source that uses the term "Feminist urbanism" and clarified how the other sources used support the definition provided. Perimeander ( talk) 12:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello wikipedians,
I understand that this is topical focused article on the theory of feminist urbanism. While that certainly is a great academic theory, in practice it is not WP:Mainstream and does not read WP:NPOV. Opinion literature, art, and other works are generally not reliable unbiased references that would contribute to the article topic as previously suggested. I would suggest that this article content be reframed under a WP:NPOV format and then merged onto/with the urbanism page. As it is, the urbanism article itself is short and there are a wide range of urban theories that would be helpful to arrange with the main topic so as not to confuse the reader. At a high level even the urbanism page itself has problems with relying too closely on unreliable or pov sources. Randomeditor1000 ( talk) 16:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Our source cited for the following phrase: "Feminist urbanism accounts for numerous aspects of a community, including transportation, housing, family responsibilities, and housing mobility programs, as these elements of a community are often dealt with by women or most commonly impact households that are headed by women." has been marked as not containing the information in this source. I am going to remove [not in citation given] because this is, in fact, directly from the source (Boyd, Melody (2008). "The Role of Social Networks In Making Housing Choices: The Experience of the Gautreaux Two Residential Mobility Program". Cityscape. 10 (1): 41–63 – via JSTOR.), which reads: "Specifically, family responsibilites, transportation, and social networks are central issues to consider from a feminist urbanism perspective, because these issues largely shape the experiences of the women in their placement neighborhoods," and "Feminist urbanism is particularly relevant in analyzing housing mobility programs." Because the text cited directly mentions how Feminist urbanism is concerned with all of the things listed in this phrase, I believe that it is correct to cite the given source. Is there something about this that is still unclear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perimeander ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
I am a Rice Architecture student who would love to contribute to this article by expanding on the concepts of Feminist Urbanism. I would provide both further information about this theory and examples of how patriarchy has affected and continues to affect the built environment. Moreover, I want to outline the ways in which these patriarchal movements affect women and society at large, and finally provide a larger list of advocates, resources and projects that have been made to improve this situation. I invite you to check my user page for further information on this possible contribution. Ennis Architect ( talk) 00:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)