This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, I think you can remove the stub message, there is nothing more to say about the Bundesversammlung. But some historic details I can add in the next days. But first I have to refresh my English a bit, not written for many years. -- Grabert 23:32, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
"The candidate, whose party or parties have the majority, is considered to be the likely winner and mostly, he got the majority." Have there been any cases when the public affiliation of the majority members was not reflected in the result? matturn 12:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
The Bundestag is not "(the lower house of Germany's parliament)". The German constitution doesn't know terms of lower or higher, there is both Bundestag = parliament and Bundesrat, which is *not* a parliament. -- 194.239.181.126 ( talk) 17:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was article moved to Federal Convention (Germany). Bundesversammlung articles for other countries should considered separately. Aervanath ( talk) 15:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
The name of this article is not english! I suggest it is renamed to Federal Assembly (Germany) per policy WP:Use English. AndrewRT( Talk) 22:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
The one cited source. Deutsche Welle, uses the term "Federal Assembly." However, the term used in the Basic Law translation at http://www.bundestag.de is "Federal Convention." ( here, p. 38) The Presidential website also uses "Federal Convention" as does this source.
I personally prefer "Federal Assembly" because it more clearly and precisely describes what the body is. "Federal Convention" could imply other meanings found at the convention article, e.g. a temporary convention (meeting)/ political convention or a treaty. " Assembly" doesn't have this range of political connotations. But I recognize that "Federal Convention" seems to have a more sound basis in actual usage. — AjaxSmack 03:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Federal Convention (Germany). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to start this discussion (again) and ask to decide on the name of this institution and also on the name of the Bundesversammlung of the German Confederation of 1815. How about using "Federal Convention" for the 1949 organ to elect a president, because "convention" sounds more like a meeting during a shorter time. And "Federal Assembly" would be great for the 1815 organ that was a permanent institution. Or, does "assembly" sounds to English native speakers more like a parliamentary organ? Then "convention" may be more suited for the 1815 organ. Opinions? Ziko ( talk) 19:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, I think you can remove the stub message, there is nothing more to say about the Bundesversammlung. But some historic details I can add in the next days. But first I have to refresh my English a bit, not written for many years. -- Grabert 23:32, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
"The candidate, whose party or parties have the majority, is considered to be the likely winner and mostly, he got the majority." Have there been any cases when the public affiliation of the majority members was not reflected in the result? matturn 12:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
The Bundestag is not "(the lower house of Germany's parliament)". The German constitution doesn't know terms of lower or higher, there is both Bundestag = parliament and Bundesrat, which is *not* a parliament. -- 194.239.181.126 ( talk) 17:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was article moved to Federal Convention (Germany). Bundesversammlung articles for other countries should considered separately. Aervanath ( talk) 15:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
The name of this article is not english! I suggest it is renamed to Federal Assembly (Germany) per policy WP:Use English. AndrewRT( Talk) 22:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
The one cited source. Deutsche Welle, uses the term "Federal Assembly." However, the term used in the Basic Law translation at http://www.bundestag.de is "Federal Convention." ( here, p. 38) The Presidential website also uses "Federal Convention" as does this source.
I personally prefer "Federal Assembly" because it more clearly and precisely describes what the body is. "Federal Convention" could imply other meanings found at the convention article, e.g. a temporary convention (meeting)/ political convention or a treaty. " Assembly" doesn't have this range of political connotations. But I recognize that "Federal Convention" seems to have a more sound basis in actual usage. — AjaxSmack 03:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Federal Convention (Germany). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to start this discussion (again) and ask to decide on the name of this institution and also on the name of the Bundesversammlung of the German Confederation of 1815. How about using "Federal Convention" for the 1949 organ to elect a president, because "convention" sounds more like a meeting during a shorter time. And "Federal Assembly" would be great for the 1815 organ that was a permanent institution. Or, does "assembly" sounds to English native speakers more like a parliamentary organ? Then "convention" may be more suited for the 1815 organ. Opinions? Ziko ( talk) 19:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)