This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fashion (2008 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fashion (2008 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
The sources cited do not mention that a "women-centric film" or "whole female cast" should be a hindrance to the film doing well financially, so those sentences should be removed. BollyJeff | talk 18:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
This review says that Kitu's performance was the best:
These two reviews say that Kangana's performance was the best:
This should be noted in the article. BollyJeff | talk 18:20, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
In the #Themes and allusions section particularly, there's a lot of unintentional plagiarism. It's not enough to insert a footnote; if you're using whole phrases and sentences from reviews (not rewriting them in your own words), they need to be in quotes (and should be sparingly used). If readers want to see a review, they can follow the link from the footnote. Mini apolis 19:20, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SL93 ( talk · contribs) 03:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Quote - "Bhandarkar was amazed by the attention paid to the fashion industry by the media and the public, and thought delving into the fashion world intriguing." would need to be written as a quote due to it being close to "I was amazed at the overwhelming attention given to the fashion Industry by the media and the public. I thought the idea of delving deep into the fashion world was very interesting and intriguing."
Done: Added as a quote.— Prashant 04:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
"Bhandarkar (known for researching his subject matter to make his films as realistic as possible) did nearly eight months of research into the fashion industry, attending fashion weeks and shows to gain insight into how the industry was run." should have what is in the parentheses incorporated into the article without them.
The article meets Good Article criteria otherwise. SL93 ( talk) 03:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Done: Fixed all the issues.— Prashant 04:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I am passing this article. SL93 ( talk) 11:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Done: Added other information about production, themes, and soundtrack in the lead.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Removed.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Broke into two sentences.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Removed.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the plot section.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Checked and removed disambiguation link.— Prashant 06:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the development section.— Prashant 08:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the casting section.— Prashant 08:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the character section and merged it with casting section.— Prashant 09:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the sting section.— Prashant 09:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the filming section.— Prashant 09:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the themes and allusions section.— Prashant 09:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the soundtrack section.— Prashant 09:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the marketing and release section.— Prashant 10:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Corrected overlinking.— Prashant 10:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Paraphrased some of the quotes.— Prashant 04:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked.— Prashant 04:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Box Office India, the most reliable box office source for Indian films clearly mentions Fashion as an average grosser, as can be seen from this source: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=215 The POV glorification must be removed from the article. -- smarojit HD 09:13, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Any plans to correct same claims from Kahaani? Dwaipayanc told me that the business of indian cinema is not crystal clear, so we can use other sources. Much like what he has used for Kahaani and what you have used in Vidya Balan's page. Fashion was a commercial success. you yourself have mentioned Ghulam a hit and when Bolyjeff noticed you changed it to commercial success. It was not even questioned if Anjaana Anjaani's actress was Vidya or Rani. When you used the same technique Where was POV? Dont waste our time.— Prashant 16:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Here are some solid sources:
Any more questions??— Prashant 02:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Who told you the first one is not a reliable source? iDiva is apart of The Times of India group and the last one says that the film was a successfull. The first one also says it was a commercial hit.
Also, The film was made on the budget of 18 cr.—
Prashant
03:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Fashion (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://content.ibnlive.in.com/article/03-Sep-2006movies-news/fashion-next-on-madhurs-film-list-20489-8.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hindustantimes.com/IndiaSectionPage/Entertainment/Music-Review-Fashion/Article1-342990.aspx{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/printarticle.aspx?page=comments&action=add§id=13&contentid=2008102420081024022639161a87a9e7c&subsite={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/Bollwood/Harman-and-Priyanka-to-clash-at-box-office/Article1-325030.aspx{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.outlookindia.com/story.aspx?sid=1&aid=626223When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fashion (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.outlookindia.com/story.aspx?sid=1&aid=626223When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fashion (2008 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fashion (2008 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
The sources cited do not mention that a "women-centric film" or "whole female cast" should be a hindrance to the film doing well financially, so those sentences should be removed. BollyJeff | talk 18:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
This review says that Kitu's performance was the best:
These two reviews say that Kangana's performance was the best:
This should be noted in the article. BollyJeff | talk 18:20, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
In the #Themes and allusions section particularly, there's a lot of unintentional plagiarism. It's not enough to insert a footnote; if you're using whole phrases and sentences from reviews (not rewriting them in your own words), they need to be in quotes (and should be sparingly used). If readers want to see a review, they can follow the link from the footnote. Mini apolis 19:20, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SL93 ( talk · contribs) 03:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Quote - "Bhandarkar was amazed by the attention paid to the fashion industry by the media and the public, and thought delving into the fashion world intriguing." would need to be written as a quote due to it being close to "I was amazed at the overwhelming attention given to the fashion Industry by the media and the public. I thought the idea of delving deep into the fashion world was very interesting and intriguing."
Done: Added as a quote.— Prashant 04:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
"Bhandarkar (known for researching his subject matter to make his films as realistic as possible) did nearly eight months of research into the fashion industry, attending fashion weeks and shows to gain insight into how the industry was run." should have what is in the parentheses incorporated into the article without them.
The article meets Good Article criteria otherwise. SL93 ( talk) 03:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Done: Fixed all the issues.— Prashant 04:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I am passing this article. SL93 ( talk) 11:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Done: Added other information about production, themes, and soundtrack in the lead.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Removed.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Broke into two sentences.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Removed.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the plot section.— Prashant 06:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Checked and removed disambiguation link.— Prashant 06:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the development section.— Prashant 08:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the casting section.— Prashant 08:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the character section and merged it with casting section.— Prashant 09:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the sting section.— Prashant 09:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the filming section.— Prashant 09:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the themes and allusions section.— Prashant 09:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the soundtrack section.— Prashant 09:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked the marketing and release section.— Prashant 10:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Corrected overlinking.— Prashant 10:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Paraphrased some of the quotes.— Prashant 04:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Done: Tweaked.— Prashant 04:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Box Office India, the most reliable box office source for Indian films clearly mentions Fashion as an average grosser, as can be seen from this source: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=215 The POV glorification must be removed from the article. -- smarojit HD 09:13, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Any plans to correct same claims from Kahaani? Dwaipayanc told me that the business of indian cinema is not crystal clear, so we can use other sources. Much like what he has used for Kahaani and what you have used in Vidya Balan's page. Fashion was a commercial success. you yourself have mentioned Ghulam a hit and when Bolyjeff noticed you changed it to commercial success. It was not even questioned if Anjaana Anjaani's actress was Vidya or Rani. When you used the same technique Where was POV? Dont waste our time.— Prashant 16:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Here are some solid sources:
Any more questions??— Prashant 02:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Who told you the first one is not a reliable source? iDiva is apart of The Times of India group and the last one says that the film was a successfull. The first one also says it was a commercial hit.
Also, The film was made on the budget of 18 cr.—
Prashant
03:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Fashion (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://content.ibnlive.in.com/article/03-Sep-2006movies-news/fashion-next-on-madhurs-film-list-20489-8.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hindustantimes.com/IndiaSectionPage/Entertainment/Music-Review-Fashion/Article1-342990.aspx{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/printarticle.aspx?page=comments&action=add§id=13&contentid=2008102420081024022639161a87a9e7c&subsite={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/Bollwood/Harman-and-Priyanka-to-clash-at-box-office/Article1-325030.aspx{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.outlookindia.com/story.aspx?sid=1&aid=626223When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fashion (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.outlookindia.com/story.aspx?sid=1&aid=626223When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)