This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Judging by the way this article is written it is in a need of an update. It looks like it has not been updated since 2007 and many things have changed. -legal and illegal streaming websites have become the dominant way which Anime fans consume fan-subs over the past 5 years as internet connections have improved. -Pressures from fan-subbing has lead to a widespread practice of content creators simulcasting their shows where shows are subbed and broacast thin 1 hour of the Japanese release. -Many popular anime are now hosted by content creators for free on ad-based/subscription sites like hulu, netflix, crunchyroll,funimation and diasuki. - I don't want to edit the article myself since I don't know how to correctly include these changes in a manner that is consistent with expectation of wikiperdia. These are changes that seem to have been taken
2602:306:C456:A060:8514:1E19:A8FB:2FF9 ( talk) 16:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
I felt that the ending paragraph in this section (perhaps even statements in other areas) were incredibly biased in the phrasing. Statement were made such as "Some say *insert argument- like "fansubs increase popularity of anime"*, BUT *reason why it is not true, which is stated as fact and not opinion or what the other side believes*". I felt it should be editted slightly so identical content would remain but slightly altered phrasing- "Proponents of fansubbing feel *insert content*, however opponents feel *insert responding argument*". I feel this portrays each position more fairly and removes the strong bias I felt eminating from the document. I feel that it is important that we try our best to make sure wikipedia represents a neutral view without coming across like an involved party.
-Pat —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.68.239.27 ( talk) 02:50, October 9, 2006
It was informative and entertaining, which I think are two qualities needed in abundance on this site. To whoever wrote this article, bravo and good job! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.55.193.129 ( talk) 17:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Noticed almost no activity in the talk page and that information in this area was lacking. Appended a paragraph to the end of the "Legal and ethical issues" section regarding the low quality of some official subs in contrast to the fairly consistent quality of fansubs; I couldn't find a more suitable section and as a single paragraph didn't feel it merited it's own section yet. I'm not very good with the WP standards (probably needs some neutrality revision) and I couldn't find a good way to use citations so used a prominent example instead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.91.176 ( talk) 00:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
en.wp: "A fansub (short for fan-subtitled) is a version of a foreign film or foreign television program which has been translated by fans and subtitled into a language other than that of the original."
Shouldn't it maybe simply be more like: "a fansub is a subtitled version of a film or TV show or video or even song (= some music with lyrics in it) or audio drama by fans or in some situations for fans". - Yodonothav ( talk) 21:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Going to drop the uncited and OR here for now... at least until I can grab sources and rewrite them. The material does not seem to be false, but it is highly detailed.
I think it may be easier to create Anime fansubs because this is all so biased to the anime works. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fansub. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Judging by the way this article is written it is in a need of an update. It looks like it has not been updated since 2007 and many things have changed. -legal and illegal streaming websites have become the dominant way which Anime fans consume fan-subs over the past 5 years as internet connections have improved. -Pressures from fan-subbing has lead to a widespread practice of content creators simulcasting their shows where shows are subbed and broacast thin 1 hour of the Japanese release. -Many popular anime are now hosted by content creators for free on ad-based/subscription sites like hulu, netflix, crunchyroll,funimation and diasuki. - I don't want to edit the article myself since I don't know how to correctly include these changes in a manner that is consistent with expectation of wikiperdia. These are changes that seem to have been taken
2602:306:C456:A060:8514:1E19:A8FB:2FF9 ( talk) 16:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
I felt that the ending paragraph in this section (perhaps even statements in other areas) were incredibly biased in the phrasing. Statement were made such as "Some say *insert argument- like "fansubs increase popularity of anime"*, BUT *reason why it is not true, which is stated as fact and not opinion or what the other side believes*". I felt it should be editted slightly so identical content would remain but slightly altered phrasing- "Proponents of fansubbing feel *insert content*, however opponents feel *insert responding argument*". I feel this portrays each position more fairly and removes the strong bias I felt eminating from the document. I feel that it is important that we try our best to make sure wikipedia represents a neutral view without coming across like an involved party.
-Pat —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.68.239.27 ( talk) 02:50, October 9, 2006
It was informative and entertaining, which I think are two qualities needed in abundance on this site. To whoever wrote this article, bravo and good job! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.55.193.129 ( talk) 17:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Noticed almost no activity in the talk page and that information in this area was lacking. Appended a paragraph to the end of the "Legal and ethical issues" section regarding the low quality of some official subs in contrast to the fairly consistent quality of fansubs; I couldn't find a more suitable section and as a single paragraph didn't feel it merited it's own section yet. I'm not very good with the WP standards (probably needs some neutrality revision) and I couldn't find a good way to use citations so used a prominent example instead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.91.176 ( talk) 00:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
en.wp: "A fansub (short for fan-subtitled) is a version of a foreign film or foreign television program which has been translated by fans and subtitled into a language other than that of the original."
Shouldn't it maybe simply be more like: "a fansub is a subtitled version of a film or TV show or video or even song (= some music with lyrics in it) or audio drama by fans or in some situations for fans". - Yodonothav ( talk) 21:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Going to drop the uncited and OR here for now... at least until I can grab sources and rewrite them. The material does not seem to be false, but it is highly detailed.
I think it may be easier to create Anime fansubs because this is all so biased to the anime works. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fansub. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)