![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am the mediator for the case. I hope to focus all discussion regarding the articles involved on that page. Could all concerned parties attend? Thank you. -- Evanx( tag?) 19:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Actually, runners-up are recorded in almost all forms of competition awards. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Clubs#Achievements CanbekEsen 22:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I can't find that one. Was it erased? I am so upset. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.110.134.12 ( talk) 00:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC).
They are totally different teams so every record that belonged to Anyang should not belong to FC Seoul. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.76.179.12 ( talk) 12:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC).
K-League officill history is the FC Seoul is the the successor of Anyang LG Cheetash Anyang LG's former franchiese is Seoul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boojanam01 ( talk • contribs) 08:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
There are multiple questions:
1) Is it appropriate to describe the owners of the team as "the well-known GS Group." or is that bad writing style in violation of WP:PEACOCK? 2) Is it appropriate to describe the coach of the team as "the FC legend " or is that bad writing style in violation of WP:PEACOCK? 3) Is it appropriate to call the club "one of the most successful and the most popular club" because it is something every Korean knows, or do we need a source not connected to the team to provide that analysis as required by WP:OR and WP:V? 4) Is it appropriate to have this external link [* FC Seoul Official Kit Supplier Le Coq Sportif Authorized Retail Stores Locations : Gangnam L-PLACE/COEX Mall Store/Lotte Department Store in Myeongdong etc or is that a violation of multiple portions of the external link guidelines such as "it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic." and "One should generally avoid ... 5.Links to individual web pages[4] that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising. For example, the mobile phone article does not link to web pages that mostly promote or advertise cell-phone products or services." and "One should generally avoid ... 13' Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject."
Anyone interested in participating on the discussion regarding a proposal received at the Merger Request Noticeboard as to whether Anyang LG Cheetahs should be merged into FC Seoul should add their input below. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
{Transferred from Talk:Anyang LG Cheetahs: Merge Like merger of Bucheon SK and Jeju United FC. FC Seoul and Anyang LG Cheetahs have to be mergered. FC Seoul and Anyang LG Cheetahs are officially same club. Also There's a huge overlap between FC Seol and Anyang LG Cheetahs article. In Korean wikipedia, Also two articles are merged. Footwiks ( talk)}
I also approve this motion as it's a critical step in both helping readers understand the history behind the single entity of FC Seoul. -- weka ( talk) 16:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Merge: Two articles covered same contents. Withfact ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
I have figured out how to edit, upload and change the kit for football teams. With that I am slowly going through the earlier uniforms and making them resemble to actual looks more closely. I'm using this link to the Historic uniforms.
My question at the moment is this. The first uniforms had a white band across the chest. Should this be considered a visual characteristic that must be part of the designs on the wiki page, or should it only be considered part of the advertising. If we decide that it is part of the visual design then I can create a template image that resembles it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OttoSilver ( talk • contribs) 14:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am the mediator for the case. I hope to focus all discussion regarding the articles involved on that page. Could all concerned parties attend? Thank you. -- Evanx( tag?) 19:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Actually, runners-up are recorded in almost all forms of competition awards. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Clubs#Achievements CanbekEsen 22:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I can't find that one. Was it erased? I am so upset. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.110.134.12 ( talk) 00:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC).
They are totally different teams so every record that belonged to Anyang should not belong to FC Seoul. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.76.179.12 ( talk) 12:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC).
K-League officill history is the FC Seoul is the the successor of Anyang LG Cheetash Anyang LG's former franchiese is Seoul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boojanam01 ( talk • contribs) 08:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
There are multiple questions:
1) Is it appropriate to describe the owners of the team as "the well-known GS Group." or is that bad writing style in violation of WP:PEACOCK? 2) Is it appropriate to describe the coach of the team as "the FC legend " or is that bad writing style in violation of WP:PEACOCK? 3) Is it appropriate to call the club "one of the most successful and the most popular club" because it is something every Korean knows, or do we need a source not connected to the team to provide that analysis as required by WP:OR and WP:V? 4) Is it appropriate to have this external link [* FC Seoul Official Kit Supplier Le Coq Sportif Authorized Retail Stores Locations : Gangnam L-PLACE/COEX Mall Store/Lotte Department Store in Myeongdong etc or is that a violation of multiple portions of the external link guidelines such as "it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic." and "One should generally avoid ... 5.Links to individual web pages[4] that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising. For example, the mobile phone article does not link to web pages that mostly promote or advertise cell-phone products or services." and "One should generally avoid ... 13' Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject."
Anyone interested in participating on the discussion regarding a proposal received at the Merger Request Noticeboard as to whether Anyang LG Cheetahs should be merged into FC Seoul should add their input below. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
{Transferred from Talk:Anyang LG Cheetahs: Merge Like merger of Bucheon SK and Jeju United FC. FC Seoul and Anyang LG Cheetahs have to be mergered. FC Seoul and Anyang LG Cheetahs are officially same club. Also There's a huge overlap between FC Seol and Anyang LG Cheetahs article. In Korean wikipedia, Also two articles are merged. Footwiks ( talk)}
I also approve this motion as it's a critical step in both helping readers understand the history behind the single entity of FC Seoul. -- weka ( talk) 16:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Merge: Two articles covered same contents. Withfact ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
I have figured out how to edit, upload and change the kit for football teams. With that I am slowly going through the earlier uniforms and making them resemble to actual looks more closely. I'm using this link to the Historic uniforms.
My question at the moment is this. The first uniforms had a white band across the chest. Should this be considered a visual characteristic that must be part of the designs on the wiki page, or should it only be considered part of the advertising. If we decide that it is part of the visual design then I can create a template image that resembles it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OttoSilver ( talk • contribs) 14:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)