![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 November 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Cory Arcangel was listed twice in the list of notable artists & reseachers. I removed the redundancy.
Someone posting as anon continues to revise the History section with biased text that is neither verifiable nor cited. Their last login was from IP 66.108.185.223. -- Yatta 02:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Again removed personal dispute info from History section contributed by IP 24.185.247.127. -- Yatta ( talk) 23:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I believe I know the author of the "Eyebeam kr.jpg" image that was just removed, or can find someone who has taken a similiar photo that will be happy to license freely. Was the issue that the image didn't have any license info? -- Jamiew ( talk) 16:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
The image was CC licensed, but not free enough. I replaced the image with one I took recently that I put in wiki commons and licensed in the public domain. -- Dronthego ( talk) 19:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Should list of artists become a category? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dronthego ( talk • contribs) 03:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
See the Wikipedia event page for the Eyebeam Art + Feminism Edit-a-Thon in New York on February 1st, 2013. OR drohowa ( talk) 16:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
I was on the Eyebeam page today to check for something, and noticed that the Alumni have been removed. User:Sionk who made the edits noted in their edit comments that "most articles don't mention Eyebeam and, in any case, it isn't a college!" Eyebeam refers to its past residents and fellows as alumni, and in some ways is like a post-graduate research institute. This is common with other residencies: Skowhegan does the same, and is noted as such on wiki. It is the equivalent of "notable recipients" or some equivalent list/category. It is important to have a list. I agree that the giant list full of redlinks was not productive. Maybe it should be a category? What do you think User:Dronthego? I know you have worked on this page in the past, and have recently created a category for the Category:San Francisco Art Institute alumni as it was too many to fit on the page, and you couldn't make distinctions on who was more notable than others. Bottom line is that a list should be on wiki, though what form it takes is open. Furthermore, Sionk noted that the articles don't mention Eyebeam: they should. That is clearly a discrete task that should be done: add a note under awards/residencies for each page saying they were a resident or fellow at Eyebeam.-- Theredproject ( talk) 18:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 November 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Cory Arcangel was listed twice in the list of notable artists & reseachers. I removed the redundancy.
Someone posting as anon continues to revise the History section with biased text that is neither verifiable nor cited. Their last login was from IP 66.108.185.223. -- Yatta 02:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Again removed personal dispute info from History section contributed by IP 24.185.247.127. -- Yatta ( talk) 23:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I believe I know the author of the "Eyebeam kr.jpg" image that was just removed, or can find someone who has taken a similiar photo that will be happy to license freely. Was the issue that the image didn't have any license info? -- Jamiew ( talk) 16:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
The image was CC licensed, but not free enough. I replaced the image with one I took recently that I put in wiki commons and licensed in the public domain. -- Dronthego ( talk) 19:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Should list of artists become a category? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dronthego ( talk • contribs) 03:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
See the Wikipedia event page for the Eyebeam Art + Feminism Edit-a-Thon in New York on February 1st, 2013. OR drohowa ( talk) 16:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
I was on the Eyebeam page today to check for something, and noticed that the Alumni have been removed. User:Sionk who made the edits noted in their edit comments that "most articles don't mention Eyebeam and, in any case, it isn't a college!" Eyebeam refers to its past residents and fellows as alumni, and in some ways is like a post-graduate research institute. This is common with other residencies: Skowhegan does the same, and is noted as such on wiki. It is the equivalent of "notable recipients" or some equivalent list/category. It is important to have a list. I agree that the giant list full of redlinks was not productive. Maybe it should be a category? What do you think User:Dronthego? I know you have worked on this page in the past, and have recently created a category for the Category:San Francisco Art Institute alumni as it was too many to fit on the page, and you couldn't make distinctions on who was more notable than others. Bottom line is that a list should be on wiki, though what form it takes is open. Furthermore, Sionk noted that the articles don't mention Eyebeam: they should. That is clearly a discrete task that should be done: add a note under awards/residencies for each page saying they were a resident or fellow at Eyebeam.-- Theredproject ( talk) 18:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)