This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Europa: The Last Battle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the stated length really correct? If so that would make this film over 12 hours in length, surpassing even Paint Drying (which, no doubt, has far more artistic value than this film).
I get that a lot of far-rightists are NEET-types who have _way_ too much free time on their hands (and thus would be more willing to make, and/or watch, overly-long propaganda pieces). But even so, 746 minutes seems awfully excessive. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:CEB1 ( talk) 04:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
This article should be marked as no neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.10.142.196 ( talk) 13:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
"Neutral point of view" is. "No neutral" isn't. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
The article relies on quotes from Biased sources to "Prove" its point. 222.108.156.194 ( talk) 00:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi!
i'm fairly new on this so it may be nothing, but the sources appear to me as out of order, for example at the beginning going from 2 to 3 to 11. It seems to be the result of previous editing and sentence deletion, but it could be fixed and the article would look nicer. ZenZeppelin ( talk) 14:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Europa: The Last Battle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the stated length really correct? If so that would make this film over 12 hours in length, surpassing even Paint Drying (which, no doubt, has far more artistic value than this film).
I get that a lot of far-rightists are NEET-types who have _way_ too much free time on their hands (and thus would be more willing to make, and/or watch, overly-long propaganda pieces). But even so, 746 minutes seems awfully excessive. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:CEB1 ( talk) 04:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
This article should be marked as no neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.10.142.196 ( talk) 13:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
"Neutral point of view" is. "No neutral" isn't. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
The article relies on quotes from Biased sources to "Prove" its point. 222.108.156.194 ( talk) 00:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi!
i'm fairly new on this so it may be nothing, but the sources appear to me as out of order, for example at the beginning going from 2 to 3 to 11. It seems to be the result of previous editing and sentence deletion, but it could be fixed and the article would look nicer. ZenZeppelin ( talk) 14:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)