This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest that the reference to "keypointsabout.org" be removed, so the "unreliable sources" warning can be cleared. Bill Woodcock ( talk) 15:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ BarisTulip, you've recently made large-scale edits to this page that nominally "improved" the article but also removed large amounts of content. The first time you did so, I reverted you, asking for an explanation. You have just gone ahead and made the same/similar edit, again with a cryptic edit summary. Please explain your intentions here before proceeding to make the same edit again. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 13:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Re: Hi @ Revirvlkodlaku, thank you so much for your input and help with this. I am not connected to the subject (ethos or any of its' officers) but I do work for ICANN. I'm not asked by anyone to make these edits. I'm doing it on my own to improve the Ethos article so that it doesn't just give the impression that Ethos was set up with the sole intention of acquiring the .org domain. I personally don't think it's fair how the current content on the page reflects on Ethos or ICANN (whose officer was connected to Ethos).
Earlier versions of this page definitely had more balanced and factual content. The page as it exists now is just negative commentary that puts Ethos, ICANN, their officers in a negative light implying that everyone was involved in corruption and had nefarious intents.
Please let me know what I need to do to update the content of this page. Is it just because of the portions I deleted? If I edit those portions and post content that accurately reflects Ethos, would that be acceptable to you?
Please let me know :) BarisTulip( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
— Preceding undated comment added 20:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
You can restore this one if you like. This version mentions what Ethos is + also mentions the .org deal.
Please let me know. - BarisTulip ( talk)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest that the reference to "keypointsabout.org" be removed, so the "unreliable sources" warning can be cleared. Bill Woodcock ( talk) 15:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ BarisTulip, you've recently made large-scale edits to this page that nominally "improved" the article but also removed large amounts of content. The first time you did so, I reverted you, asking for an explanation. You have just gone ahead and made the same/similar edit, again with a cryptic edit summary. Please explain your intentions here before proceeding to make the same edit again. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 13:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Re: Hi @ Revirvlkodlaku, thank you so much for your input and help with this. I am not connected to the subject (ethos or any of its' officers) but I do work for ICANN. I'm not asked by anyone to make these edits. I'm doing it on my own to improve the Ethos article so that it doesn't just give the impression that Ethos was set up with the sole intention of acquiring the .org domain. I personally don't think it's fair how the current content on the page reflects on Ethos or ICANN (whose officer was connected to Ethos).
Earlier versions of this page definitely had more balanced and factual content. The page as it exists now is just negative commentary that puts Ethos, ICANN, their officers in a negative light implying that everyone was involved in corruption and had nefarious intents.
Please let me know what I need to do to update the content of this page. Is it just because of the portions I deleted? If I edit those portions and post content that accurately reflects Ethos, would that be acceptable to you?
Please let me know :) BarisTulip( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
— Preceding undated comment added 20:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
You can restore this one if you like. This version mentions what Ethos is + also mentions the .org deal.
Please let me know. - BarisTulip ( talk)