This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
The inscription was identified as KI 14. However, KI 14 is a different inscription ("To Baalyaton, etc."). I have therefore made the reference to KI 14 [
] (temporarily) invisible.
Hans van Deukeren (
talk) 16:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The correct identifier appears to be RES 297. I have applied this correction to the article.
Hans van Deukeren (
talk) 11:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hans van Deukeren: You are right. I followed KI14 to Lidzbarksi's Ephemeris, page 55f, where p.55 shows this inscription, but KI14 is actually the one Lidzbarksi's Ephemeris shows on page 56. Thank you for spotting this.
Onceinawhile (
talk) 11:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
The inscription was identified as KI 14. However, KI 14 is a different inscription ("To Baalyaton, etc."). I have therefore made the reference to KI 14 [
] (temporarily) invisible.
Hans van Deukeren (
talk) 16:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The correct identifier appears to be RES 297. I have applied this correction to the article.
Hans van Deukeren (
talk) 11:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hans van Deukeren: You are right. I followed KI14 to Lidzbarksi's Ephemeris, page 55f, where p.55 shows this inscription, but KI14 is actually the one Lidzbarksi's Ephemeris shows on page 56. Thank you for spotting this.
Onceinawhile (
talk) 11:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)reply