From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article consists of nothing but completely direct, neutral, public, verifiable, judgment-free statements. Every sentence without its own footnote can be verified by a web search. Given that I'm not sure it matters if it was written by someone who is 'close' (citation needed for *that*). I think some of the scary warnings can be removed. Can a human tell me what is objectionable about the page? Thanks Jar354 ( talk) 13:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article consists of nothing but completely direct, neutral, public, verifiable, judgment-free statements. Every sentence without its own footnote can be verified by a web search. Given that I'm not sure it matters if it was written by someone who is 'close' (citation needed for *that*). I think some of the scary warnings can be removed. Can a human tell me what is objectionable about the page? Thanks Jar354 ( talk) 13:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook