![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As he was a German-born Russian Jew, I expect his surname was originally pronounced "Kha-in" (possibly derived from chaim). But in Britain, I imagine it became pronounced like "Chain", as in, a connected series of links. True? -- JackofOz ( talk) 23:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
That should be mentioned in the article: http://www.icr.org/article/3767/ -- 41.151.137.130 ( talk) 11:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
I agree. He was a theistic evolutionist, accepting evolution of species but rejecting Abiogenesis, or "Materialistic Evolution" — but I've seen creationists citing him as opposed to biological evolution, which is quite false, so I think it would be good to mention his belief in divine creation and evolution.
But I've only got one reference, so I'm putting it here:
Concerning the Materialistic theory of evolution Ernst Chain (who is a theistic evolutionist) states: “I would rather believe in fairies than in such wild speculation. I have said for years that speculations about the origin of life lead to no useful purpose as even the simplest living system is far too complex to be understood in terms of the extremely primitive chemistry scientists have used in their attempts to explain the unexplainable that happened billions of years ago. God cannot be explained away by such naive thoughts.” (Chain, as cited in The Life of Ernst Chain: Penicillin and Beyond by Ronald W. Clark, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1985, 147-148).
page 35 here: https://scigod.com/file/SGJ_V1(3).pdf
But looking at the passages cited by icr.org as linked by 41.151.137.130 above, I think just saying "he was a theistic evolutionist" might be misleading. Needs more thought.
BAPhilp (
talk)
13:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ernst Boris Chain. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Since Chain was one of several people working under Florey, what exactly did he do that was so special to garner him the Nobel along with Florey and Fleming instead of one of his other colleagues? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HBBorges ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As he was a German-born Russian Jew, I expect his surname was originally pronounced "Kha-in" (possibly derived from chaim). But in Britain, I imagine it became pronounced like "Chain", as in, a connected series of links. True? -- JackofOz ( talk) 23:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
That should be mentioned in the article: http://www.icr.org/article/3767/ -- 41.151.137.130 ( talk) 11:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
I agree. He was a theistic evolutionist, accepting evolution of species but rejecting Abiogenesis, or "Materialistic Evolution" — but I've seen creationists citing him as opposed to biological evolution, which is quite false, so I think it would be good to mention his belief in divine creation and evolution.
But I've only got one reference, so I'm putting it here:
Concerning the Materialistic theory of evolution Ernst Chain (who is a theistic evolutionist) states: “I would rather believe in fairies than in such wild speculation. I have said for years that speculations about the origin of life lead to no useful purpose as even the simplest living system is far too complex to be understood in terms of the extremely primitive chemistry scientists have used in their attempts to explain the unexplainable that happened billions of years ago. God cannot be explained away by such naive thoughts.” (Chain, as cited in The Life of Ernst Chain: Penicillin and Beyond by Ronald W. Clark, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1985, 147-148).
page 35 here: https://scigod.com/file/SGJ_V1(3).pdf
But looking at the passages cited by icr.org as linked by 41.151.137.130 above, I think just saying "he was a theistic evolutionist" might be misleading. Needs more thought.
BAPhilp (
talk)
13:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ernst Boris Chain. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Since Chain was one of several people working under Florey, what exactly did he do that was so special to garner him the Nobel along with Florey and Fleming instead of one of his other colleagues? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HBBorges ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)