This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Kia ora, a new page for consideration. Constructive feedback and suggestions most welcome. Realitylink ( talk) 22:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Re the suggestion that I have a conflict of interest in regard to the subject, I have never met Olssen in person or any professional capacity and have no connections with his place of work. While we did have some interractions by email and one phone call, these were mostly introductory. Olssen saw some of the draft work, but any suggestions made were carefully scrutinized by myself and I retained full editorial integrity in making changes. I would suggest there is no conflict of interest and certainly no conscious effort on my part to promote the subject. I will spend more time over the next few days checking any language that may give that impression. I accept that the quotations need simplifying and reduced and will spend time on this as well. Realitylink ( talk) 00:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I have done considerable editing on the quotations and feel that the tag could be removed. I will look at doing this in the next day or two pending further discussion. For the other tag, I am wondering if folks could give examples of promotional language, inappropriate external links or text that suggests the point of view is not neutral. I am happy to have a discussion about this. Realitylink ( talk) 22:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
There are a number of places in the article where square brackets and single quote marks are used outside of quotations. I'm wondering if this text is copied verbatim from sources and the quote marks are missing, or if this text can be rephrased to remove the square brackets. Double quote marks are always used for the outermost marks, per MOS:DOUBLE. -- Beland ( talk) 20:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Kia ora, a new page for consideration. Constructive feedback and suggestions most welcome. Realitylink ( talk) 22:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Re the suggestion that I have a conflict of interest in regard to the subject, I have never met Olssen in person or any professional capacity and have no connections with his place of work. While we did have some interractions by email and one phone call, these were mostly introductory. Olssen saw some of the draft work, but any suggestions made were carefully scrutinized by myself and I retained full editorial integrity in making changes. I would suggest there is no conflict of interest and certainly no conscious effort on my part to promote the subject. I will spend more time over the next few days checking any language that may give that impression. I accept that the quotations need simplifying and reduced and will spend time on this as well. Realitylink ( talk) 00:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I have done considerable editing on the quotations and feel that the tag could be removed. I will look at doing this in the next day or two pending further discussion. For the other tag, I am wondering if folks could give examples of promotional language, inappropriate external links or text that suggests the point of view is not neutral. I am happy to have a discussion about this. Realitylink ( talk) 22:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
There are a number of places in the article where square brackets and single quote marks are used outside of quotations. I'm wondering if this text is copied verbatim from sources and the quote marks are missing, or if this text can be rephrased to remove the square brackets. Double quote marks are always used for the outermost marks, per MOS:DOUBLE. -- Beland ( talk) 20:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)