This page was proposed for deletion by Jmertel23 ( talk · contribs) on 10 July 2019.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Eric Monkman. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Eric Monkman at the Reference desk.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. University of Cambridge This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles Canada: Ontario Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

It has been suggested that we create a combined article on Monkman and Seagull. What do people think? PatGallacher ( talk) 20:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Oh go on, then. Martinevans123 ( talk) 14:13, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

This article could point out that Bobby Seagull sometimes devises the puzzles which get told on the Today programme on BBC Radio 4. Vorbee ( talk) 16:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC) reply

As Monkman and Seagull were both contestants on University Challenge, this article could be added to the category "Contestants on University Challenge". Vorbee ( talk) 17:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

This article could say "Wolfson College were beaten" in place of where it says "were beaten". Vorbee ( talk) 08:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Bobby Seagull has appeared on the BBC Radio 4 series Any Questions?, and this could be mentioned in the article. Vorbee ( talk) 09:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Go for it. Especially if he said something important and you can remember what it was! (I think he said he keen on education funding, but I tend to doze through that programme these days...) A source where he wrote something along the same lines would be useful correlation (and if he is prone to give interviews and / or is writing for an English daily paper might not be so hard to find) Success Charles01 ( talk) 22:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Ooh, that suggestion looks familiar (see above)? Was there a WP:RM to split the combined article back into two?? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 18:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC) reply

I mean Bobby Seagull gets the raw end of the deal here, doesn't he? Even though they became equally notable. Martinevans123 ( talk) 18:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC) reply