![]() | Equitable Building (Manhattan) has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 1, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Equitable Building (Manhattan) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 June 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The article makes an impression that it was a major, if not principal, cause for the 1916 regulations. Carrol Willis ( Form follows finance..., p.69) says the opposite: Equitable was completed when political support for the codes already was solid. In 1913-1915 NYC experienced a local overbuilding crisis and developers supported limitations regardless of any single project.
I'm not quite sure how to integrate this POV into article without ruining its current flow of content (most of it serving the other POV). Ideas? NVO ( talk) 08:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk) 06:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk · contribs) 15:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Equitable Building (Manhattan) has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 1, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Equitable Building (Manhattan) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 June 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The article makes an impression that it was a major, if not principal, cause for the 1916 regulations. Carrol Willis ( Form follows finance..., p.69) says the opposite: Equitable was completed when political support for the codes already was solid. In 1913-1915 NYC experienced a local overbuilding crisis and developers supported limitations regardless of any single project.
I'm not quite sure how to integrate this POV into article without ruining its current flow of content (most of it serving the other POV). Ideas? NVO ( talk) 08:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk) 06:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk · contribs) 15:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)