This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Ginsburg quotation was not in her dissent, Which is the original source. Kdammers ( talk) 10:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC) reply

It wasn't in the written dissent but it was in the oral comments she made from the bench at the time the decision was made (with WaPost having that source for that quote). It is not 100% the same as the written version (they rarely are) but still is the same point. -- Masem ( t) 13:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC) reply