 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Energies per unit mass page were merged into Energy density and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
The author of this article needs to learn how to communicate, a skill that he/she seems to lack completely. mbeychok 02:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.
- Above is a "canned" answer (see template:sofixit). Apparently others agree with your assessment and have flagged the article in various ways. There is no single author to direct your comments to. Samw 05:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
I say we merge. Thoughts? mastodon 22:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Algae 09:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Alexignatiou 06:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
kinetic energy is 1/2 m v^2; mass is missing....
I say we merge too. Key point to draw out in merged doco is why Hydrogen is power store of choice for transports of the future over even batteries.
Yep, also agree that it should be merged. Thanks Byron
I noticed that the page for "specific energy" redirects into this page...but I think this is misleading. Specific energy is a meaningful physical quantity in thermodynamics whereas "energy per unit mass" is just a unit. I'm kind of new to editting stuff in wikipedia, but should I just go ahead an make a seperate page for specific energy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icksa ( talk • contribs) 23:32, 24 May 2006
- The above user didn't do this, so I did. !jim 19:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
What happened to the "per unit volume" table? - 66.92.33.119 19:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| The contents of the Energies per unit mass page were merged into Energy density and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
The author of this article needs to learn how to communicate, a skill that he/she seems to lack completely. mbeychok 02:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.
- Above is a "canned" answer (see template:sofixit). Apparently others agree with your assessment and have flagged the article in various ways. There is no single author to direct your comments to. Samw 05:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
I say we merge. Thoughts? mastodon 22:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Algae 09:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Alexignatiou 06:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
kinetic energy is 1/2 m v^2; mass is missing....
I say we merge too. Key point to draw out in merged doco is why Hydrogen is power store of choice for transports of the future over even batteries.
Yep, also agree that it should be merged. Thanks Byron
I noticed that the page for "specific energy" redirects into this page...but I think this is misleading. Specific energy is a meaningful physical quantity in thermodynamics whereas "energy per unit mass" is just a unit. I'm kind of new to editting stuff in wikipedia, but should I just go ahead an make a seperate page for specific energy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icksa ( talk • contribs) 23:32, 24 May 2006
- The above user didn't do this, so I did. !jim 19:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
What happened to the "per unit volume" table? - 66.92.33.119 19:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)