This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Radio-carbon dating of the scroll, as reported in the Science Advances article, gives third or fourth century C.E. NOT first century. William Ellison ( talk) 10:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Are there no available images of the virtual unwrapping? After reading all the technical details of the virtual unwrapping, it's somewhat disappointing not to see the results. -- 184.64.102.148 ( talk) 18:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Gary A. Rendsburg has written in ANE Today in 2018 that the scroll might contain one, two, or at the most three of the five books of Moses.
There is nothing in the crt article on the topic, leaving the reader to believe that the couple of dozen lines deciphered in 2015 (?) is all there is. I'll introduce Rendsburg's info, but unfortunately that post is gone, and ANET (ASOR's monthly e-newsletter), although perfectly RS (as is Rendsburg) is not the ideal source. Arminden ( talk) 19:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Radio-carbon dating of the scroll, as reported in the Science Advances article, gives third or fourth century C.E. NOT first century. William Ellison ( talk) 10:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Are there no available images of the virtual unwrapping? After reading all the technical details of the virtual unwrapping, it's somewhat disappointing not to see the results. -- 184.64.102.148 ( talk) 18:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Gary A. Rendsburg has written in ANE Today in 2018 that the scroll might contain one, two, or at the most three of the five books of Moses.
There is nothing in the crt article on the topic, leaving the reader to believe that the couple of dozen lines deciphered in 2015 (?) is all there is. I'll introduce Rendsburg's info, but unfortunately that post is gone, and ANET (ASOR's monthly e-newsletter), although perfectly RS (as is Rendsburg) is not the ideal source. Arminden ( talk) 19:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)