 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This is written a bit much like a "how to".
What about some history: when this was introduced, for example? - Jmabel | Talk 00:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian ( talk) 03:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Employment Authorization Document →
Employment authorization document –
Just why Enric Naval would "support" the downcasing of Certificate of Occupancy and Certificate of Need ("this is the generic name of a type of documents") but revert this to caps is beyond me. Here, "Foreign nationals with an EAD can lawfully work in the United States for any employer." It's just a work permit: nothing magical.
Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 10:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Heh. Because for this one I checked websites instead of books. Many books downcase it [1]. Support this move, I was mistaken in reverting Tony's move. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 10:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Enric. Dicklyon ( talk) 14:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support Logical, as it seems pretty generic from the outset. -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This is written a bit much like a "how to".
What about some history: when this was introduced, for example? - Jmabel | Talk 00:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian ( talk) 03:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Employment Authorization Document →
Employment authorization document –
Just why Enric Naval would "support" the downcasing of Certificate of Occupancy and Certificate of Need ("this is the generic name of a type of documents") but revert this to caps is beyond me. Here, "Foreign nationals with an EAD can lawfully work in the United States for any employer." It's just a work permit: nothing magical.
Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 10:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Heh. Because for this one I checked websites instead of books. Many books downcase it [1]. Support this move, I was mistaken in reverting Tony's move. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 10:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Enric. Dicklyon ( talk) 14:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support Logical, as it seems pretty generic from the outset. -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.