This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello all,
I am planning on doing a rewrite of this page. I'll keep anything worth keeping, but there's a lot that should be added so I'm going to reword a lot, probably. If anyone has anything to contribute, please post it here.
Thanks,
Geneocide (
talk)
01:15, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Many of ACSHs scientific advisors spread ACSHs views in the sceptical movement. S Barrett and S. Novella to mention only two them. Maybe some can give a complete list to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.192.165 ( talk) 10:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Whelan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Whelan’s articles in professional and “lay” publications are included in one large number. How many peer reviewed articles did she publish? Nicmart ( talk) 05:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
This is an incredibly biased and unfair entry. It's totally unworthy of Wikipedia. Just for example, there is in fact no evidence that Love Canal caused birth defects, but the article makes it look like Whelan was making it up. I have no status here, so I know any changes I would to make would just be undone, but whomever is in charge of this article should be ashamed. 2600:4040:4523:F200:F4EF:A339:44F2:EFF5 ( talk) 23:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello all,
I am planning on doing a rewrite of this page. I'll keep anything worth keeping, but there's a lot that should be added so I'm going to reword a lot, probably. If anyone has anything to contribute, please post it here.
Thanks,
Geneocide (
talk)
01:15, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Many of ACSHs scientific advisors spread ACSHs views in the sceptical movement. S Barrett and S. Novella to mention only two them. Maybe some can give a complete list to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.192.165 ( talk) 10:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Whelan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Whelan’s articles in professional and “lay” publications are included in one large number. How many peer reviewed articles did she publish? Nicmart ( talk) 05:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
This is an incredibly biased and unfair entry. It's totally unworthy of Wikipedia. Just for example, there is in fact no evidence that Love Canal caused birth defects, but the article makes it look like Whelan was making it up. I have no status here, so I know any changes I would to make would just be undone, but whomever is in charge of this article should be ashamed. 2600:4040:4523:F200:F4EF:A339:44F2:EFF5 ( talk) 23:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)