This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Electronic warfare officer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is extremely outdated for current EWO training. It also contains gross errors. Cizzo 03:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
I concur. It is also very USAF-centric; other armed services and other nations use EWOs, both in airborne and surface based platforms and facilities. It's a small point, but EWOs are not limited to denying the effective use of the E-M spectrum; they also exploit its use by an enemy/adversary by sensing and capturing/recording and analysing the details of the transmissions etc.
An EW operator in the Royal Navy (rarely is such a person a commissioned 'officer') is sometimes referred to as a "Golly". I do not know the derivation (Gollywog?) and wonder if and how that information might be incorporated and linked in Wikipedia. EWoc 14:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Is an EWO a navigator? I want to apply for AECP but only if I can be an EWO on the RC-135. Since, AECP won't accept anyone for pilot or nav programs I wouldn't be able to do it. I'm a 1A8 now and I would really like to stay in this community. If anyone knows let me know.
EWO training at the 563rd is part of initial EWO training, not sure you could really call it "advanced"-- 75.64.143.121 ( talk) 18:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Electronic warfare officer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is extremely outdated for current EWO training. It also contains gross errors. Cizzo 03:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
I concur. It is also very USAF-centric; other armed services and other nations use EWOs, both in airborne and surface based platforms and facilities. It's a small point, but EWOs are not limited to denying the effective use of the E-M spectrum; they also exploit its use by an enemy/adversary by sensing and capturing/recording and analysing the details of the transmissions etc.
An EW operator in the Royal Navy (rarely is such a person a commissioned 'officer') is sometimes referred to as a "Golly". I do not know the derivation (Gollywog?) and wonder if and how that information might be incorporated and linked in Wikipedia. EWoc 14:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Is an EWO a navigator? I want to apply for AECP but only if I can be an EWO on the RC-135. Since, AECP won't accept anyone for pilot or nav programs I wouldn't be able to do it. I'm a 1A8 now and I would really like to stay in this community. If anyone knows let me know.
EWO training at the 563rd is part of initial EWO training, not sure you could really call it "advanced"-- 75.64.143.121 ( talk) 18:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)