El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 26, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
A fact from El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 May 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did Konami distribute this game or not I see news saying they would but nothing saying that happened so just not sure. Nbisbo ( talk) 22:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Just commenting on the last edit. Lucifer comes from Latin "Lux" and "-fer", literally: "Light bearer". Lucifel makes no sense, heh. If they wanted to combine Latin with the Hebrew El, "Luciel" would have been better. And there is already actually an angel with the intended name - Uri'el (also spelled Oriel, Auriel), from Hebrew "God is my light". But Google concurs. :P Spelling is correctly Lucifel.-- Obsidi♠n Soul 13:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Correctly as in: The English version of the game? Japanese Romaji transliteration doesn't use "l". (because the Japanese language doesn't distinguish between /r/ and /l/.) -- megA ( talk) 08:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Why is there no in-depth plot summary? I don't have the game myself so I can't add one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.180.224.100 ( talk) 19:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
References that can be used in the article. There are so many that the usual "useful refs" table will not do, so here they are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32. I know it's rather a lot, but they are here now. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 20:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/features/1up-2011-awards-editors-picksWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 22:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
I'll be reviewing the article in exchange from Protodrake's review. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
@ ProtoDrake:
That's all. While the reception could be toned down in generalizations, it's in good state for a GA. Just revise this and I'll gladly pass it. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk) 21:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by ProtoDrake ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 16:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: GA finalised on the day it was submitted, so AOK there, and far more than long enough, a very comprehensive work-up on the topic. Lots of referencing, fine citation in general, as you'd expect from a piece that made it through GA review in quick time - BUT the two paragraphs, added in response to a GA review point, of Synopsis, are uncited - I'm sure this can be quickly fixed. No past DYK found, no copyvio (a couple of 10.x%s relate to company and game names). Hook citations as required on the first two, with the third being in a sentence structure that needed a tiny copyedit and merge anyway. Alt 0 is solid though unexciting - 4 years sounds long to a lay audience, as does the growth from 4 to 120+, but neither is actually so exceptional. Alt1 is interesting to those who know IT / software development, but the average reader might go "what's middleware" or "is use of 5 middlewares unusual" (it is, but...)? Alt2 is solid for interest, but probably we need an Alt2a with a comma after "audience". So, a fine article, at least one hook potential (I would approve both Alt0 and Alt2), but that citation fix needed, and if any more hooks can be found, great. SeoR ( talk) 00:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 26, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
A fact from El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 May 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did Konami distribute this game or not I see news saying they would but nothing saying that happened so just not sure. Nbisbo ( talk) 22:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Just commenting on the last edit. Lucifer comes from Latin "Lux" and "-fer", literally: "Light bearer". Lucifel makes no sense, heh. If they wanted to combine Latin with the Hebrew El, "Luciel" would have been better. And there is already actually an angel with the intended name - Uri'el (also spelled Oriel, Auriel), from Hebrew "God is my light". But Google concurs. :P Spelling is correctly Lucifel.-- Obsidi♠n Soul 13:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Correctly as in: The English version of the game? Japanese Romaji transliteration doesn't use "l". (because the Japanese language doesn't distinguish between /r/ and /l/.) -- megA ( talk) 08:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Why is there no in-depth plot summary? I don't have the game myself so I can't add one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.180.224.100 ( talk) 19:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
References that can be used in the article. There are so many that the usual "useful refs" table will not do, so here they are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32. I know it's rather a lot, but they are here now. -- ProtoDrake ( talk) 20:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/features/1up-2011-awards-editors-picksWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 22:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
I'll be reviewing the article in exchange from Protodrake's review. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
@ ProtoDrake:
That's all. While the reception could be toned down in generalizations, it's in good state for a GA. Just revise this and I'll gladly pass it. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk) 21:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by ProtoDrake ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 16:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: GA finalised on the day it was submitted, so AOK there, and far more than long enough, a very comprehensive work-up on the topic. Lots of referencing, fine citation in general, as you'd expect from a piece that made it through GA review in quick time - BUT the two paragraphs, added in response to a GA review point, of Synopsis, are uncited - I'm sure this can be quickly fixed. No past DYK found, no copyvio (a couple of 10.x%s relate to company and game names). Hook citations as required on the first two, with the third being in a sentence structure that needed a tiny copyedit and merge anyway. Alt 0 is solid though unexciting - 4 years sounds long to a lay audience, as does the growth from 4 to 120+, but neither is actually so exceptional. Alt1 is interesting to those who know IT / software development, but the average reader might go "what's middleware" or "is use of 5 middlewares unusual" (it is, but...)? Alt2 is solid for interest, but probably we need an Alt2a with a comma after "audience". So, a fine article, at least one hook potential (I would approve both Alt0 and Alt2), but that citation fix needed, and if any more hooks can be found, great. SeoR ( talk) 00:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)