This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Eindhoven Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This needs a photo of the front entrance. WhisperToMe ( talk) 01:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
The airport is closing somewhere around 22:30 (or at 22:00 I'm not sure), and only opening at 6:30!! (this is not sure either). It should be notated.-- Dadooo0 ( talk) 10:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
The airport's developements since 2011 are not covered at all. The extention should be covered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.155.68.105 ( talk) 14:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
RgSim ( talk · contribs) and an anon have been removing refs from this and other airports, commenting "standardized; only refs for new routes or to be terminated routes" and "Existing routes don't need a ref".
What is the standard or other rationale being spoken of? Batternut ( talk) 07:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Regardless of WP:BURDEN, running routes don't require references unless they're charters. This is because live routes are very easy to track and verify and it is only in the case of changes to these routes that references are needed - such as new route or routes ending etc. In the case of these Ryanair routes in question, they have been running for a while which is easily evident through Flightradar24 and the likes. References like these just clutter the page up. RgSim ( talk) 06:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Wasn't the Dynamo Music Festival held each year on this airport? 84.62.20.61 ( talk) 18:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Eindhoven Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This needs a photo of the front entrance. WhisperToMe ( talk) 01:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
The airport is closing somewhere around 22:30 (or at 22:00 I'm not sure), and only opening at 6:30!! (this is not sure either). It should be notated.-- Dadooo0 ( talk) 10:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
The airport's developements since 2011 are not covered at all. The extention should be covered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.155.68.105 ( talk) 14:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
RgSim ( talk · contribs) and an anon have been removing refs from this and other airports, commenting "standardized; only refs for new routes or to be terminated routes" and "Existing routes don't need a ref".
What is the standard or other rationale being spoken of? Batternut ( talk) 07:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Regardless of WP:BURDEN, running routes don't require references unless they're charters. This is because live routes are very easy to track and verify and it is only in the case of changes to these routes that references are needed - such as new route or routes ending etc. In the case of these Ryanair routes in question, they have been running for a while which is easily evident through Flightradar24 and the likes. References like these just clutter the page up. RgSim ( talk) 06:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Wasn't the Dynamo Music Festival held each year on this airport? 84.62.20.61 ( talk) 18:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)