This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
There are also sources that show it with two words. The two terms were used interchangebly.
Canada Soccer articleStatscrewAFTN FC Edmonton articleInter SC Ross Ongaro profileCanada Soccer profile all use two words with a space and even the csl1987 fan site article in your post uses both terms in its article. Even league official documents used both terms interchangeably -
1989 Stats (they use Brickmen in standings but Brick Men on awards page). Does not appear to be one or the other. Agreed though that a discussion could probably be beneficial for more views on this. I changed it to Brick Men under
WP:BOLD (also this article had used the two-word term prior to my edits, only the title was singular since
this edit. Given
Walter Görlitz (
talk·contribs) believes we should revert to the one word, we can use the
WP:BRD policy and discuss with more input from others.
RedPatchBoy (
talk)
18:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)reply
If consensus cannot be reached,
WP:TITLECHANGES says to revert to the title in use when the article ceased to be a stub. The question will then arise as to what comprises stub/not stub format. This was the
last edit prior to my move and article expansion. It was mostly unreferenced (one single citation) and contained limited information. I expanded and updated the article with greater detail and fully referenced and moved it to its current title.
RedPatchBoy (
talk)
19:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The last edit prior to your move was also done by you ; )
I'm fine with leaving the current name and indicating that they were also called Brickmen. That should satisfy the sources and anyone looking for a disagreement.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
21:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
There are also sources that show it with two words. The two terms were used interchangebly.
Canada Soccer articleStatscrewAFTN FC Edmonton articleInter SC Ross Ongaro profileCanada Soccer profile all use two words with a space and even the csl1987 fan site article in your post uses both terms in its article. Even league official documents used both terms interchangeably -
1989 Stats (they use Brickmen in standings but Brick Men on awards page). Does not appear to be one or the other. Agreed though that a discussion could probably be beneficial for more views on this. I changed it to Brick Men under
WP:BOLD (also this article had used the two-word term prior to my edits, only the title was singular since
this edit. Given
Walter Görlitz (
talk·contribs) believes we should revert to the one word, we can use the
WP:BRD policy and discuss with more input from others.
RedPatchBoy (
talk)
18:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)reply
If consensus cannot be reached,
WP:TITLECHANGES says to revert to the title in use when the article ceased to be a stub. The question will then arise as to what comprises stub/not stub format. This was the
last edit prior to my move and article expansion. It was mostly unreferenced (one single citation) and contained limited information. I expanded and updated the article with greater detail and fully referenced and moved it to its current title.
RedPatchBoy (
talk)
19:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The last edit prior to your move was also done by you ; )
I'm fine with leaving the current name and indicating that they were also called Brickmen. That should satisfy the sources and anyone looking for a disagreement.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
21:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)reply