This looks like another well-researched article on New York theatres by Epicgenius and so is likely to be close to Good Article status without much work. I will start my review soon.
simongraham (
talk) 08:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Comments
This is a stable and well-written article. 90.8% of authorship is by Epicgenius. It is currently ranked B class.
The article is of appropriate length, 5,719 words of readable prose, plus a referenced list of notable productions and an infobox.
It is written in a summary style, consistent with relevant
Manuals of Style.
Citations seem to be thorough and extensive, with 285 listed.
Please confirm that phish.net is reputable.
That appears to have been the band's own website. Nevertheless, I have replaced it with a news article.
Epicgenius (
talk) 19:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Other references appear to be from reputable sources.
Images have appropriate licensing and CC tags.
Earwig's Copyvio Detector identifies a 17.4% chance of copyright violation with what looks like a blog and 11.5% with the theatre's website.
The lead repeats that Stephen Colbert is there now. Is this necessary?
I have reduced the repetition now.
Epicgenius (
talk) 19:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Should "teletape" be capitalised?
It was a proper name, "Teletape Studios", which I have made clear now.
Epicgenius (
talk) 19:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
"The office section to the east is six bays wide and 13 stories high, with the windows on each stories being grouped in pairs" I believe "stories" should be singular.
I see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.
@
Epicgenius: Congratulations of another well-written piece of work. Please ping me when you would like me to take another look.
simongraham (
talk) 08:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Simongraham: Thanks for the comments. I have now addressed all the comments you brought up.
Epicgenius (
talk) 19:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
This looks like another well-researched article on New York theatres by Epicgenius and so is likely to be close to Good Article status without much work. I will start my review soon.
simongraham (
talk) 08:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Comments
This is a stable and well-written article. 90.8% of authorship is by Epicgenius. It is currently ranked B class.
The article is of appropriate length, 5,719 words of readable prose, plus a referenced list of notable productions and an infobox.
It is written in a summary style, consistent with relevant
Manuals of Style.
Citations seem to be thorough and extensive, with 285 listed.
Please confirm that phish.net is reputable.
That appears to have been the band's own website. Nevertheless, I have replaced it with a news article.
Epicgenius (
talk) 19:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Other references appear to be from reputable sources.
Images have appropriate licensing and CC tags.
Earwig's Copyvio Detector identifies a 17.4% chance of copyright violation with what looks like a blog and 11.5% with the theatre's website.
The lead repeats that Stephen Colbert is there now. Is this necessary?
I have reduced the repetition now.
Epicgenius (
talk) 19:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Should "teletape" be capitalised?
It was a proper name, "Teletape Studios", which I have made clear now.
Epicgenius (
talk) 19:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
"The office section to the east is six bays wide and 13 stories high, with the windows on each stories being grouped in pairs" I believe "stories" should be singular.
I see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.
@
Epicgenius: Congratulations of another well-written piece of work. Please ping me when you would like me to take another look.
simongraham (
talk) 08:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Simongraham: Thanks for the comments. I have now addressed all the comments you brought up.
Epicgenius (
talk) 19:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)reply