This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Family and relationships ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I'd say it's of high importance. The concept impinges on divorce, welfare, cohabitation, the so-called " marriage penalty", and so on. -- Uncle Ed ( talk) 04:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply

• But maybe I shouldn't have mentioned the latter, since I started it - the Deletionists might try to prod or AfD it out of existence! -- Uncle Ed ( talk) 04:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply

There is an issue with the reference John Paul Parks ( talk · contribs) added on August 3, 2016: the article author and title do not match with the publication information. 68 Marquette L. Rev. 448 (Spring 1985) is an article by J. J. Podell, whereas Reppy's "The Uniform Marital Property Act: Some Suggested Revisions for a Basically Sound Act" was published in the Houston Law Review (Vol. 21, p. 679). Both articles obviously deal with similar issues, so which one was the correct reference here? -- bender235 ( talk) 13:52, 20 April 2018 (UTC) reply