![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove defunct Sao Paulo and Dubai offices, replace with new Shanghai and Kuala Lumpur offices http://www.ecohousegroup.com/contact.php Stevecastro ( talk) 16:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
is not required for edits to unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages.
Technical 13 (
talk)
16:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Wanted to put without protected edit section however it came up automatically and didn't know how to change it. Can anyone tell me for future reference how to add it for COI instead? On this occasion, just wanted to double check that info should be changed as on company website and didn't require third party reference. Stevecastro ( talk) 16:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
On the other page I asked on the help chat and another admin changed it for me. Stevecastro ( talk) 16:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey everyone, I was on Anthony Armstrong Emery's page earlier, looking for some things that could be updated, and came across this article about him and EchoHouse Group. [1] There's some information in here that I think we can use to expand this article with! Adamh4 ( talk) 20:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
I read the line "they do not appear on the 2013 Inteligência Empresarial da Construção list of the hundred largest construction companies in Brazil" in the lede, but then also read a Financial Times article [ [2]] states that EcoHouse is "one of the largest property and construction companies in northeast Brazil." These two statements conflict with each other, does anyone else thing a change could be made here? Adamh4 ( talk) 19:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks for helping me figure the situation
Adamh4 (
talk)
18:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello again, stumbled back across this page and noticed that it says EcoHouse was founded in 2009, and its source makes no mention of this. I found a Telegraph article [ [3]] that says it was founded in 2007. Should we make an edit to fix that? Adamh4 ( talk) 17:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I think the sentence in the history section that says "In January 2013, EcoHouse reached a joint investment agreement with Conisa Constructions..." should be edited to say "In January 2013, EcoHouse acquired a 50% stake in Conisa Constructions," as noted by this source [4]. If we have the specific information of how much the investment is, I think that's an important detail to be included. Let me know what you all think. Adamh4 ( talk) 14:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey everyone, The part of the lede that mentions claim that Ecohouse is one of the largest construction companies in Brazil could use some background information on how it got there -- this article [5] explains that it reached that point after merging with the construction company "Corsina." I'd like to add in a small sentence about this merger in the lede as well as the history; let me know if you all agree. Adamh4 ( talk) 16:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
I think we should move the paragraph that says "On visiting EcoHouse's social housing projects..." from the History section to the Social Housing section. The rest of the information in the History section is referring to specific dates, which that does not, making it look out of place. It would fit better in the Social Housing sections because it is talking about social housing, and not necessarily a specific moment in the company's history that was very crucial. What does everyone think? If you all agree, I can make that change soon. Adamh4 ( talk) 18:45, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
http://tribunadonorte.com.br/noticia/armstrong-a-investigado-por-fraudes/297343 and http://tribunadonorte.com.br/noticia/ecohouse-deixa-da-bito-de-r-300-mil-no-a-verda-oa/297344 might be useful to a Portuguese speaker looking to improve the article. The details of what they say are beyond me. Pinkbeast ( talk) 13:42, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on EcoHouse Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.pwc.co.uk/business-recovery/administrations/ecohouse-developments-ltd-in-creditors-voluntary-liquidation-the-company.jhtmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove defunct Sao Paulo and Dubai offices, replace with new Shanghai and Kuala Lumpur offices http://www.ecohousegroup.com/contact.php Stevecastro ( talk) 16:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
is not required for edits to unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages.
Technical 13 (
talk)
16:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Wanted to put without protected edit section however it came up automatically and didn't know how to change it. Can anyone tell me for future reference how to add it for COI instead? On this occasion, just wanted to double check that info should be changed as on company website and didn't require third party reference. Stevecastro ( talk) 16:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
On the other page I asked on the help chat and another admin changed it for me. Stevecastro ( talk) 16:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey everyone, I was on Anthony Armstrong Emery's page earlier, looking for some things that could be updated, and came across this article about him and EchoHouse Group. [1] There's some information in here that I think we can use to expand this article with! Adamh4 ( talk) 20:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
I read the line "they do not appear on the 2013 Inteligência Empresarial da Construção list of the hundred largest construction companies in Brazil" in the lede, but then also read a Financial Times article [ [2]] states that EcoHouse is "one of the largest property and construction companies in northeast Brazil." These two statements conflict with each other, does anyone else thing a change could be made here? Adamh4 ( talk) 19:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks for helping me figure the situation
Adamh4 (
talk)
18:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello again, stumbled back across this page and noticed that it says EcoHouse was founded in 2009, and its source makes no mention of this. I found a Telegraph article [ [3]] that says it was founded in 2007. Should we make an edit to fix that? Adamh4 ( talk) 17:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I think the sentence in the history section that says "In January 2013, EcoHouse reached a joint investment agreement with Conisa Constructions..." should be edited to say "In January 2013, EcoHouse acquired a 50% stake in Conisa Constructions," as noted by this source [4]. If we have the specific information of how much the investment is, I think that's an important detail to be included. Let me know what you all think. Adamh4 ( talk) 14:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey everyone, The part of the lede that mentions claim that Ecohouse is one of the largest construction companies in Brazil could use some background information on how it got there -- this article [5] explains that it reached that point after merging with the construction company "Corsina." I'd like to add in a small sentence about this merger in the lede as well as the history; let me know if you all agree. Adamh4 ( talk) 16:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
I think we should move the paragraph that says "On visiting EcoHouse's social housing projects..." from the History section to the Social Housing section. The rest of the information in the History section is referring to specific dates, which that does not, making it look out of place. It would fit better in the Social Housing sections because it is talking about social housing, and not necessarily a specific moment in the company's history that was very crucial. What does everyone think? If you all agree, I can make that change soon. Adamh4 ( talk) 18:45, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
http://tribunadonorte.com.br/noticia/armstrong-a-investigado-por-fraudes/297343 and http://tribunadonorte.com.br/noticia/ecohouse-deixa-da-bito-de-r-300-mil-no-a-verda-oa/297344 might be useful to a Portuguese speaker looking to improve the article. The details of what they say are beyond me. Pinkbeast ( talk) 13:42, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on EcoHouse Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.pwc.co.uk/business-recovery/administrations/ecohouse-developments-ltd-in-creditors-voluntary-liquidation-the-company.jhtmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)