From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The medieval section is poor

The pre-roman section is good. The rest is a little sketchy. The author's english is not very good. Also the period 700-100 is a little brief, it merely skims over improtant issues, and often is wrong. I will edit it in a little while.

Missing source],

Some sources appear to be missing from the section on the Illyrian period. Bracketed numbers ([7], [8], [9]) have been written into the body of the text rather than provided as links to footnotes. Nikolaj1905 ( talk) 11:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The medieval section is poor

The pre-roman section is good. The rest is a little sketchy. The author's english is not very good. Also the period 700-100 is a little brief, it merely skims over improtant issues, and often is wrong. I will edit it in a little while.

Missing source],

Some sources appear to be missing from the section on the Illyrian period. Bracketed numbers ([7], [8], [9]) have been written into the body of the text rather than provided as links to footnotes. Nikolaj1905 ( talk) 11:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook