This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Greier, such info belongs to the realm of jingo-Marxism. When you cite Marx, do you also refer to his praise for Kossuth against Iancu, and his belief that the Croatians were naturally inferior? That stuff about Vasile Lupu being Aromanian is bullshit. Really, stop reading Ilie Ceauşescu (especially the claim that the revolt of Horea was inspired by the Enlightenment). Dahn 12:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
The Capitulations WERE NOT REAL. They are an invention of 18th century boyars to use against princes. Dahn 12:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Since when is Woodrow Wilson a historian to mention when dealing with the 18th century? Do you happen to get newspapers 150 years later where you live at?
Dahn
12:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Partea cu "factual accuracy" e inca o dovada de cat de josnic esti.
Greier
13:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
I hope both of you will speak nice one to another, why should it be this way? Is it because you can't better communicate? Greier you should listen what Dahn said and Dahn you should give him credit for his edits. Let's hope you'll find a way. Communicate first. -- Moldo 14:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
To state further criticism (don't worry, Greier, you may ignore it altogether; this is for the readers and future helpers in getting some quality on this page).
I totally agree that Marx's comments on Bessarabia are totally misplaced. To begin with, there was no serfdom in Bessarabia at all after 1812. 142.244.116.247 ( talk) 01:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC) vitaky
My first note in this discussion is that this article starts with a nonsensical statement:
The end of the 15th century is 1500, and the end of the 18th is 1800, which does not match with Mihai and Tudor Vladimirescu. The choice of the dates is essential is deciding whether the merger is OK. Dpotop 13:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Someone asked me today just what transpired in the area that is now Romania during the Napoleonic Wars. I had to admit I had no clear idea, so I figured I'd look it up here. Neither this article nor the chronologically next one ( National awakening of Romania) gives me any clue, beyond the Russian occupation of Bessarabia at the tail end of it all, which I already knew about. Someone with a clue want to add something? - Jmabel | Talk 04:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Do anybody know what work of Giurescu is cited in the article? Thank you for the answer in advance. Borsoka ( talk) 16:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Greier, such info belongs to the realm of jingo-Marxism. When you cite Marx, do you also refer to his praise for Kossuth against Iancu, and his belief that the Croatians were naturally inferior? That stuff about Vasile Lupu being Aromanian is bullshit. Really, stop reading Ilie Ceauşescu (especially the claim that the revolt of Horea was inspired by the Enlightenment). Dahn 12:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
The Capitulations WERE NOT REAL. They are an invention of 18th century boyars to use against princes. Dahn 12:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Since when is Woodrow Wilson a historian to mention when dealing with the 18th century? Do you happen to get newspapers 150 years later where you live at?
Dahn
12:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Partea cu "factual accuracy" e inca o dovada de cat de josnic esti.
Greier
13:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
I hope both of you will speak nice one to another, why should it be this way? Is it because you can't better communicate? Greier you should listen what Dahn said and Dahn you should give him credit for his edits. Let's hope you'll find a way. Communicate first. -- Moldo 14:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
To state further criticism (don't worry, Greier, you may ignore it altogether; this is for the readers and future helpers in getting some quality on this page).
I totally agree that Marx's comments on Bessarabia are totally misplaced. To begin with, there was no serfdom in Bessarabia at all after 1812. 142.244.116.247 ( talk) 01:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC) vitaky
My first note in this discussion is that this article starts with a nonsensical statement:
The end of the 15th century is 1500, and the end of the 18th is 1800, which does not match with Mihai and Tudor Vladimirescu. The choice of the dates is essential is deciding whether the merger is OK. Dpotop 13:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Someone asked me today just what transpired in the area that is now Romania during the Napoleonic Wars. I had to admit I had no clear idea, so I figured I'd look it up here. Neither this article nor the chronologically next one ( National awakening of Romania) gives me any clue, beyond the Russian occupation of Bessarabia at the tail end of it all, which I already knew about. Someone with a clue want to add something? - Jmabel | Talk 04:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Do anybody know what work of Giurescu is cited in the article? Thank you for the answer in advance. Borsoka ( talk) 16:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)