This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cryptocurrency Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

1. Name

This should be renamed to ERC-20. That is the canonical naming. Full Decent ( talk) 02:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC) reply

+1 to @ Fulldecent, please go ahead. Xinbenlv ( talk) 20:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Actually in the source code maintainers are using an ERC20 name ERC20.sol Beno neno ( talk) 11:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Beno neno Instead of in the source code I will argue it should be in a source code because openzeppelin-solidity is only one of the implementations. The canonical name should refer to the canonical source which is https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20 Xinbenlv ( talk) 18:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Xinbenlv in fact that makes a lot of sense. +1 from me for renaming of an ERC20 to ERC-20. Beno neno ( talk) 05:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Kudos to being open minded. Xinbenlv ( talk) 22:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Done Cleduc ( talk) 18:13, 27 July 2018 (UTC) reply

I will work to get a more authoritative reference that the dash is preferred. Full Decent ( talk) 19:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks @ Fulldecent Xinbenlv ( talk) 22:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

I'm seeing zero or one actual RSes here, if Investopedia counts - David Gerard ( talk) 08:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC) reply

I don't think that Investopedia should count. See WP:RSP Retimuko ( talk) 16:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Redirect to Ethereum for now? - David Gerard ( talk) 17:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC) reply

I would agree. Retimuko ( talk) 17:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Literally zero RSes on this article, no action to remedy this in several weeks - I've redirected it for now. We can remake this as a standalone article when we have actual mainstream third-party RSes - David Gerard ( talk) 21:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC) reply