This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 December 2013. The result of the discussion was keep. |
References are a little messy, took me a while to sort through them all. They should be modeled after ref* #11's format.
@Pol430: Why are those two templates at the top of the page? I had to create the article for a class assignment, not sure how that qualifies as a "close connection." Colweiss ( talk) 18:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Colton
@Pol430: Sorry for the delay in response, I was on winter break. I'm going to remove the first template because I think it is redundant to mention neutrality concerns twice. The neutrality in the "History" section, particularly, the 1999 date is definitely questionable. I'll make some edits, please share any thoughts. I'll be more timely in my response since I have to monitor the page for class until the end of the semester.Thanks! Colweiss ( talk) 21:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Colton
Also, how do I edit reference #15 so that when you click on the article name it redirects the reader to the cited article? Colweiss ( talk) 22:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Colton : Fixed
I think the POV is now neutral. Unless there is an additional concern I'll remove the template. Colweiss ( talk) 15:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Colton
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on EMarketer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm really not certain that this company passes WP:GNG. The sources in this article so far are very weak, as per my source assessment table below. I've not nominated it for deletion (yet!) because I've not spent time to look for other sources that might be available, but if someone else wants to take it to WP:AFD I certainly won't object.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/19/google-is-set-to-topple-facebook-as-leader-in-display-ads/ | This is barely more than a name drop, and reporting what eMarketer has said. | ✘ No | ||
https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthof/2012/01/19/online-ad-revenues-to-pass-print-in-2012/ | Mostly just a repost of a report the company issued. | WP:FORBESCON | Little to no information about the company themselves | ✘ No |
http://www.library.hbs.edu/go/emarketer.html | Link to the company's product | ✘ No | ||
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-emarketer-m-a-axel-sprngr-idUSKCN0YW0RE/ | ? Reads like a press release, but is cited to a journalist/editor | Information about a takeover bid only, nothing substatial. | ✘ No | |
https://web.archive.org/web/20130204215737/http://venturebeatprofiles.com/company/profile/emarketer-inc | Dead link, but Wayback makes it look like it was entirely user-submitted data | ✘ No | ||
https://web.archive.org/web/20110417021139/http://ad-tech.blogs.imediaconnection.com/2011/04/12/emarketer-ceo-geoff-ramsey-receives-industry-achievement-award/ | Not significant coverage, but probably the best coverage of anything here. | ✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
stwalkerster ( talk) 19:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
DanaRHill ( talk) 20:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 December 2013. The result of the discussion was keep. |
References are a little messy, took me a while to sort through them all. They should be modeled after ref* #11's format.
@Pol430: Why are those two templates at the top of the page? I had to create the article for a class assignment, not sure how that qualifies as a "close connection." Colweiss ( talk) 18:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Colton
@Pol430: Sorry for the delay in response, I was on winter break. I'm going to remove the first template because I think it is redundant to mention neutrality concerns twice. The neutrality in the "History" section, particularly, the 1999 date is definitely questionable. I'll make some edits, please share any thoughts. I'll be more timely in my response since I have to monitor the page for class until the end of the semester.Thanks! Colweiss ( talk) 21:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Colton
Also, how do I edit reference #15 so that when you click on the article name it redirects the reader to the cited article? Colweiss ( talk) 22:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Colton : Fixed
I think the POV is now neutral. Unless there is an additional concern I'll remove the template. Colweiss ( talk) 15:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Colton
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on EMarketer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm really not certain that this company passes WP:GNG. The sources in this article so far are very weak, as per my source assessment table below. I've not nominated it for deletion (yet!) because I've not spent time to look for other sources that might be available, but if someone else wants to take it to WP:AFD I certainly won't object.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/19/google-is-set-to-topple-facebook-as-leader-in-display-ads/ | This is barely more than a name drop, and reporting what eMarketer has said. | ✘ No | ||
https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthof/2012/01/19/online-ad-revenues-to-pass-print-in-2012/ | Mostly just a repost of a report the company issued. | WP:FORBESCON | Little to no information about the company themselves | ✘ No |
http://www.library.hbs.edu/go/emarketer.html | Link to the company's product | ✘ No | ||
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-emarketer-m-a-axel-sprngr-idUSKCN0YW0RE/ | ? Reads like a press release, but is cited to a journalist/editor | Information about a takeover bid only, nothing substatial. | ✘ No | |
https://web.archive.org/web/20130204215737/http://venturebeatprofiles.com/company/profile/emarketer-inc | Dead link, but Wayback makes it look like it was entirely user-submitted data | ✘ No | ||
https://web.archive.org/web/20110417021139/http://ad-tech.blogs.imediaconnection.com/2011/04/12/emarketer-ceo-geoff-ramsey-receives-industry-achievement-award/ | Not significant coverage, but probably the best coverage of anything here. | ✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
stwalkerster ( talk) 19:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
DanaRHill ( talk) 20:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)