![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I quote, "Paramount sold a majority of their pre-1950 theatrical sound library (including films by Cecil B. DeMille and Preston Sturges) to MCA, and thus, through their new dummy company, EMKA, they were able to make a profit via airings on television." So, that would mean that EMKA was actually a dummy company for Paramount, meaning that Paramount & it's parent company would actually own EMKA and it's holdings. MCA never owned it at all.
98.193.77.218 (
talk) 03:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
This article is a stub that may not meet
WP:NOTABLE in companies. I'd say that this information be condensed into a new section in the merge to article discussing the sale of the Paramount library to Universal. Fairly OddParents Freak (
Fairlyoddparents1234)
C 22:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I disagree. It is important to inform people about what the history of this company. However their may be a link to this page on the Universal Studios page. Luxoman237 ( talk) 22:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I cant see that this is anything other than a shell corporation (it even says in the article "in name only") as a company made for the sake of the name, i cant see the relevance of a separate article.
Aguyintobooks ( talk) 21:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I quote, "Paramount sold a majority of their pre-1950 theatrical sound library (including films by Cecil B. DeMille and Preston Sturges) to MCA, and thus, through their new dummy company, EMKA, they were able to make a profit via airings on television." So, that would mean that EMKA was actually a dummy company for Paramount, meaning that Paramount & it's parent company would actually own EMKA and it's holdings. MCA never owned it at all.
98.193.77.218 (
talk) 03:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
This article is a stub that may not meet
WP:NOTABLE in companies. I'd say that this information be condensed into a new section in the merge to article discussing the sale of the Paramount library to Universal. Fairly OddParents Freak (
Fairlyoddparents1234)
C 22:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I disagree. It is important to inform people about what the history of this company. However their may be a link to this page on the Universal Studios page. Luxoman237 ( talk) 22:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I cant see that this is anything other than a shell corporation (it even says in the article "in name only") as a company made for the sake of the name, i cant see the relevance of a separate article.
Aguyintobooks ( talk) 21:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)