I think this article is a complete mess now and would suggest it is changed back to the original article I wrote (plus the improvements to formatting etc made by some other editors) as a starting point from which it may be improved, rather than the dead end it has now reached.
-- LeuvenInfo ( talk) 23:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this is the first article I have contributed to Wikipedia so please help me improve it by making suggestions. The first thing that I have done wrong is the page title - it should be E-HRM, not E-hrm - unfortunately I do not know how to change it! Thanks.
LeuvenInfo ( talk) 19:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I also realise that the reference links do not work right now - I will see if I can find out how to fix them, but if anyone else could do it before I figure it out that would be great.
LeuvenInfo ( talk) 19:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I think this article is a complete mess now and would suggest it is changed back to the original article I wrote (plus the improvements to formatting etc made by some other editors) as a starting point from which it may be improved, rather than the dead end it has now reached.
-- LeuvenInfo ( talk) 23:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
I think this article is a complete mess now and would suggest it is changed back to the original article I wrote (plus the improvements to formatting etc made by some other editors) as a starting point from which it may be improved, rather than the dead end it has now reached.
-- LeuvenInfo ( talk) 23:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this is the first article I have contributed to Wikipedia so please help me improve it by making suggestions. The first thing that I have done wrong is the page title - it should be E-HRM, not E-hrm - unfortunately I do not know how to change it! Thanks.
LeuvenInfo ( talk) 19:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I also realise that the reference links do not work right now - I will see if I can find out how to fix them, but if anyone else could do it before I figure it out that would be great.
LeuvenInfo ( talk) 19:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I think this article is a complete mess now and would suggest it is changed back to the original article I wrote (plus the improvements to formatting etc made by some other editors) as a starting point from which it may be improved, rather than the dead end it has now reached.
-- LeuvenInfo ( talk) 23:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)