![]() | E-102 Gamma was a
Video games good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the
good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions on
the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it,
please do; it may then be
renominated. Review: May 9, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
Hi
I have demoted the article as it was self-assessed by the person who recently expanded it. Self-assessments are welcome, up to a certain level, but above c-class should really go to peer review or preferably ask for an assessment change from the projects.
I will assess it later today. Chaosdruid ( talk) 10:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 18:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I'll leave some initial comments within 24 hours. I will focus on copy editing issues and the sources too. I'll have a read through now anyway. Thanks, ☠ Jag uar ☠ 18:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
All references are in check and are reliable sources. I've checked them and they are all reliable magazines and official Sega sites. One reference is in Japanese, but can be translated so this shouldn't cause a problem.
There are very little problems with this article, the only issues I could find with it were a few copy editing issues. All references are reliable and in the right place, the lead almost meets the GA criteria and the Appearances and Reception sections both meet the criteria. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days until those minor issues have been addressed. Thank you ☠ Jag uar ☠ 18:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The whole article meets the GA criteria. The prose is excellent (clear to read and understand), every reference is reliable and the citations are in the correct place. The lead now meets the GA criteria too, as it summarises the whole article. It's as comprehensive as it can be for a character who only appears mainly in one game! Looks like another Sonic GA, well done. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 14:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Please see
Talk:List of Sonic the Hedgehog video game characters#Notability for a notability discussion that pertains to this article and its series czar
♔
04:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | E-102 Gamma was a
Video games good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the
good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions on
the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it,
please do; it may then be
renominated. Review: May 9, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
Hi
I have demoted the article as it was self-assessed by the person who recently expanded it. Self-assessments are welcome, up to a certain level, but above c-class should really go to peer review or preferably ask for an assessment change from the projects.
I will assess it later today. Chaosdruid ( talk) 10:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 18:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I'll leave some initial comments within 24 hours. I will focus on copy editing issues and the sources too. I'll have a read through now anyway. Thanks, ☠ Jag uar ☠ 18:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
All references are in check and are reliable sources. I've checked them and they are all reliable magazines and official Sega sites. One reference is in Japanese, but can be translated so this shouldn't cause a problem.
There are very little problems with this article, the only issues I could find with it were a few copy editing issues. All references are reliable and in the right place, the lead almost meets the GA criteria and the Appearances and Reception sections both meet the criteria. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days until those minor issues have been addressed. Thank you ☠ Jag uar ☠ 18:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The whole article meets the GA criteria. The prose is excellent (clear to read and understand), every reference is reliable and the citations are in the correct place. The lead now meets the GA criteria too, as it summarises the whole article. It's as comprehensive as it can be for a character who only appears mainly in one game! Looks like another Sonic GA, well done. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 14:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Please see
Talk:List of Sonic the Hedgehog video game characters#Notability for a notability discussion that pertains to this article and its series czar
♔
04:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)