![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Publieke Omroep" is not a "broadcasting company" -- it is the name ("Public Broadcasting") used by the joint web presence / portal of the Dutch public broadcasting organizations.
I propose to move this article to "Public broadcasting in the Netherlands" (unless anyone has a better title suggestion) and to make appropriate adjustments to the introductory text. -- Picapica 13:00, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The article as a whole needs tidying up (spelling; grammar; style) -- the (unwikified) history section in particular needs attention. I hope to be able to give the whole thing a "wash and brush up" within the next week, and then rename it. -- Picapica 21:16, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Within the next week (2006), that is! -- Picapica 00:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Have made some changes to the intro. However, I'm still not entirely happy with it. As I said above, "Publieke Omroep" is not a "broadcasting company"; but, then again, the term as used in Dutch is much more than just a web/media/PR "brand", as it signifies, too, the public-broadcasting system as a whole as well as the particular role of the NOS as a "co-operation and co-ordination body" (samenwerkings- en coördinatieorgaan) through the Raad van bestuur Publieke Omroep'.
This all needs untangling. As there has been no opposition in the last 12 months to my re-naming proposal, I am going ahead with that. This article is a general one about the structure of public-service broadcasting in the Netherlands and therefore merits a(n English-language) title more closely reflecting that. The various meanings, already mentioned, of the Dutch expression Publieke Omroep should be specifically dealt with in the body of both this article and that on the NOS. -- Picapica 20:21, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Made a quick fix of the intro paragraph, to make it more explanatory of the title. (This remains "work in progress"...) -- Picapica 15:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
How do the regional TV broadcasters fit into the system? 220.253.114.147 04:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
What about a section listing former organisations (such as VOO) which are no longer part of the Public broadcasting system also can we have a list of the dates on which each organisation joined thr system and the process wherby a new organisation becomes entitled to airtime. 80.229.222.48 19:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
I have added a little bit to this section to reflect changes in the members entering the system. Also added descriptions to the radio stations, which was included in the Television stations but were absent in the radio section.
One thing, I've added translations to the names of the broadcasting associations, are they needed or do they distract from the original Dutch names. I thought a translation would give a better idea of what the acronyms mean in English. Neasden Villa ( talk) 16:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Already in 2007 it was announced that the Broadcaster status or types A and B (in Dutch: Omroepstatus) would be replaced by "a sliding scale", meaning: the more members, the more budget. (source: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2007/10/05/a-status-en-b-status-verdwijnen-bij-publieke-omroep). I can't find anything about the current situation. There are just member based, task based and special broadcasters, at the moment the latter are being linked to member based broadcasters and should be completed in 2016. Shouldn't the A and B status in the second table column in Dutch_public_broadcasting_system#Future_plans_.28from_2016.29 be replaced by just member based? C0re1980 ( talk) 10:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Dutch public broadcasting system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Not like a male member? quote:
"or governmental and member-based institutions with their own channels and facilities (such as PBS) – those in the Netherlands are member-based broadcasting associations that share common facilities."
—Cheers!
--
2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:3044:A2C3:2683:987B (
talk) 00:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)—Doug Bashford
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Publieke Omroep" is not a "broadcasting company" -- it is the name ("Public Broadcasting") used by the joint web presence / portal of the Dutch public broadcasting organizations.
I propose to move this article to "Public broadcasting in the Netherlands" (unless anyone has a better title suggestion) and to make appropriate adjustments to the introductory text. -- Picapica 13:00, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The article as a whole needs tidying up (spelling; grammar; style) -- the (unwikified) history section in particular needs attention. I hope to be able to give the whole thing a "wash and brush up" within the next week, and then rename it. -- Picapica 21:16, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Within the next week (2006), that is! -- Picapica 00:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Have made some changes to the intro. However, I'm still not entirely happy with it. As I said above, "Publieke Omroep" is not a "broadcasting company"; but, then again, the term as used in Dutch is much more than just a web/media/PR "brand", as it signifies, too, the public-broadcasting system as a whole as well as the particular role of the NOS as a "co-operation and co-ordination body" (samenwerkings- en coördinatieorgaan) through the Raad van bestuur Publieke Omroep'.
This all needs untangling. As there has been no opposition in the last 12 months to my re-naming proposal, I am going ahead with that. This article is a general one about the structure of public-service broadcasting in the Netherlands and therefore merits a(n English-language) title more closely reflecting that. The various meanings, already mentioned, of the Dutch expression Publieke Omroep should be specifically dealt with in the body of both this article and that on the NOS. -- Picapica 20:21, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Made a quick fix of the intro paragraph, to make it more explanatory of the title. (This remains "work in progress"...) -- Picapica 15:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
How do the regional TV broadcasters fit into the system? 220.253.114.147 04:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
What about a section listing former organisations (such as VOO) which are no longer part of the Public broadcasting system also can we have a list of the dates on which each organisation joined thr system and the process wherby a new organisation becomes entitled to airtime. 80.229.222.48 19:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
I have added a little bit to this section to reflect changes in the members entering the system. Also added descriptions to the radio stations, which was included in the Television stations but were absent in the radio section.
One thing, I've added translations to the names of the broadcasting associations, are they needed or do they distract from the original Dutch names. I thought a translation would give a better idea of what the acronyms mean in English. Neasden Villa ( talk) 16:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Already in 2007 it was announced that the Broadcaster status or types A and B (in Dutch: Omroepstatus) would be replaced by "a sliding scale", meaning: the more members, the more budget. (source: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2007/10/05/a-status-en-b-status-verdwijnen-bij-publieke-omroep). I can't find anything about the current situation. There are just member based, task based and special broadcasters, at the moment the latter are being linked to member based broadcasters and should be completed in 2016. Shouldn't the A and B status in the second table column in Dutch_public_broadcasting_system#Future_plans_.28from_2016.29 be replaced by just member based? C0re1980 ( talk) 10:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Dutch public broadcasting system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Not like a male member? quote:
"or governmental and member-based institutions with their own channels and facilities (such as PBS) – those in the Netherlands are member-based broadcasting associations that share common facilities."
—Cheers!
--
2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:3044:A2C3:2683:987B (
talk) 00:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)—Doug Bashford