This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Note: Not everyone with "Van" or some variation of is necessarily of Dutch origin. Please have a source available before adding to the list. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 14:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
there is a {{ cn}} tag in the first sentence for the actual term. I dont think the definition of the term shouldnt need a source, as common sense explains it (of course a source for the definition would be lovely all the same). Here is academic output that uses the term [1] John Vandenberg 00:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
This article does not befit the parametres set by {{ hangon}}, but a tag has come up. Anonymous Dissident Utter 07:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Considering the number of refs, and the content as at this date it is no longer a stub by any means Satu Suro 00:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dutch Australians/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
As per Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia/Booian Australian importance more than 100,000 Australian residents declared their ancestry on the 2006 Australian census as being Dutch hence this article's rating as Demographics-importance = high-- Matilda talk 00:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC) |
Substituted at 18:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Note: Not everyone with "Van" or some variation of is necessarily of Dutch origin. Please have a source available before adding to the list. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 14:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
there is a {{ cn}} tag in the first sentence for the actual term. I dont think the definition of the term shouldnt need a source, as common sense explains it (of course a source for the definition would be lovely all the same). Here is academic output that uses the term [1] John Vandenberg 00:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
This article does not befit the parametres set by {{ hangon}}, but a tag has come up. Anonymous Dissident Utter 07:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Considering the number of refs, and the content as at this date it is no longer a stub by any means Satu Suro 00:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dutch Australians/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
As per Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia/Booian Australian importance more than 100,000 Australian residents declared their ancestry on the 2006 Australian census as being Dutch hence this article's rating as Demographics-importance = high-- Matilda talk 00:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC) |
Substituted at 18:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)