This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dudesnude article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 November 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Dudesnude appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 December 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
what needs to be verified or improved? Hemanetwork ( talk) 19:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I (Adagio67) am the administrator of dudesnude.com. We were not aware there was a Wikipedia article on the site. There are a number of omissions and errors which I would like to discuss with the site owner before correcting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adagio67 ( talk • contribs) 10:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
The most important errors are on ownership and income, which are simply wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adagio67 ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
There are some gay magazine sources which are not just advertising but can be hard to track down, an early-ish example is from QX magazine Nov 2005 which has a section on dudesnude describing the site. See http://www.qxmagazine.com/pdf/backissues/qx562.pdf page 20. Fæ ( talk) 05:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I have just added a line to the "site popularity and review' section, Adagio67 ( talk) 09:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)acknowledging the award of Boyz Magazine Scene award. I was able to link to the correct page for Boyz on wikipedia, but my skills (you see how I'm not blaming the interface ;) do not extend to making it look right.
Unfortunately the Boys magazine 'website' is little more than an online reader for the latest version, so I could not add the reference to the award Adagio67 ( talk) 09:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
There was mention that one of the criteria members can choose is HIV status. This is incorrect. There is a group for HIV+ members but it's not policed and anyone can join and leave as they wish. This is not like height or age, which are selectable criteria. Adagio67 ( talk) 22:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
dudesnude was recently reviewed in Time Out New York http://newyork.timeout.com/sex-dating/1998013/beyond-craigslist-digital-resources but I can't work out how to add this to the references section. has it changed? I'm sure I've done this before. Adagio67 ( talk) 09:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
I've never been particularly comfortable with the assertion in the public health section that dudesnude (for whom I work, thus I don't want to do this edit myself) has been criticised for te options allowable in the 'condon use' section on our site. My boss has now been made aware of this by a friend who thought it unfair. Below if the email exchange I've just had with him. (i'm Robert, he's Phil)
That seems perfectly reasonable. I've not actually looked at the page in a while.
It is customary in such situations to discuss this in the talk for the entry and have someone else do the actual edit. I'll do this now.
regards, -- robert
On 6 Aug 2012, at 11:09, phil anderson wrote:
it seems the wikipedia assertion is factually incorrect. the article it cites is an opinion piece:
http://www.ebar.com/arts/art_article.php?sec=karrnal&article=29
here's the paragraph in question:
"I've been using my new computer to visit a fun website called Dudesnude.com, where real people post jpgs and even video of themselves. But I'm absolutely flabbergasted by the response to one section of the men's Personal Profiles. It asks, Practice Safer Sex? To which a whole lot of guys respond, When Appropriate. I thought Always was the appropriate time to practice safer sex. It's not something you do when you're in the mood, fellas, or when your trick tells you he's negative. Please, keep yourself alive and practice safer sex appropriately. "
so in objective fact, he's not "criticizing dudesnude for allowing" the selection, he is "criticizing some DN members for making" the selection.
he's being factually mis-represented by wikipedia when they assert he is criticizing dudesnude website.
i'm not sure if it's worth reacting to this, it feels to me that our interests in the position do somewhat disqualify us from making edits to wikipedia that could reasonably be assumed to be impartial. is there any other way to challenge it, other than simply editing it?
a more reasonable factual assertion to replace it might be:
"some dudesnude members have been criticized for selecting a condom preference of "when appropriate", this has been described as inconsistent with safer sex practices"
-- philip anderson invades limited
To be honest though I would go further in that I would disagree with the actual article. "When appropriate' is a perfectly acceptable selection. If a couple have an open relationship, they may always use a condom with third parties but not with each other. Adagio67 ( talk) 10:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dudesnude. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Dudesnude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Dudesnude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dudesnude article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 November 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Dudesnude appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 December 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
what needs to be verified or improved? Hemanetwork ( talk) 19:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I (Adagio67) am the administrator of dudesnude.com. We were not aware there was a Wikipedia article on the site. There are a number of omissions and errors which I would like to discuss with the site owner before correcting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adagio67 ( talk • contribs) 10:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
The most important errors are on ownership and income, which are simply wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adagio67 ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
There are some gay magazine sources which are not just advertising but can be hard to track down, an early-ish example is from QX magazine Nov 2005 which has a section on dudesnude describing the site. See http://www.qxmagazine.com/pdf/backissues/qx562.pdf page 20. Fæ ( talk) 05:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I have just added a line to the "site popularity and review' section, Adagio67 ( talk) 09:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)acknowledging the award of Boyz Magazine Scene award. I was able to link to the correct page for Boyz on wikipedia, but my skills (you see how I'm not blaming the interface ;) do not extend to making it look right.
Unfortunately the Boys magazine 'website' is little more than an online reader for the latest version, so I could not add the reference to the award Adagio67 ( talk) 09:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
There was mention that one of the criteria members can choose is HIV status. This is incorrect. There is a group for HIV+ members but it's not policed and anyone can join and leave as they wish. This is not like height or age, which are selectable criteria. Adagio67 ( talk) 22:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
dudesnude was recently reviewed in Time Out New York http://newyork.timeout.com/sex-dating/1998013/beyond-craigslist-digital-resources but I can't work out how to add this to the references section. has it changed? I'm sure I've done this before. Adagio67 ( talk) 09:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
I've never been particularly comfortable with the assertion in the public health section that dudesnude (for whom I work, thus I don't want to do this edit myself) has been criticised for te options allowable in the 'condon use' section on our site. My boss has now been made aware of this by a friend who thought it unfair. Below if the email exchange I've just had with him. (i'm Robert, he's Phil)
That seems perfectly reasonable. I've not actually looked at the page in a while.
It is customary in such situations to discuss this in the talk for the entry and have someone else do the actual edit. I'll do this now.
regards, -- robert
On 6 Aug 2012, at 11:09, phil anderson wrote:
it seems the wikipedia assertion is factually incorrect. the article it cites is an opinion piece:
http://www.ebar.com/arts/art_article.php?sec=karrnal&article=29
here's the paragraph in question:
"I've been using my new computer to visit a fun website called Dudesnude.com, where real people post jpgs and even video of themselves. But I'm absolutely flabbergasted by the response to one section of the men's Personal Profiles. It asks, Practice Safer Sex? To which a whole lot of guys respond, When Appropriate. I thought Always was the appropriate time to practice safer sex. It's not something you do when you're in the mood, fellas, or when your trick tells you he's negative. Please, keep yourself alive and practice safer sex appropriately. "
so in objective fact, he's not "criticizing dudesnude for allowing" the selection, he is "criticizing some DN members for making" the selection.
he's being factually mis-represented by wikipedia when they assert he is criticizing dudesnude website.
i'm not sure if it's worth reacting to this, it feels to me that our interests in the position do somewhat disqualify us from making edits to wikipedia that could reasonably be assumed to be impartial. is there any other way to challenge it, other than simply editing it?
a more reasonable factual assertion to replace it might be:
"some dudesnude members have been criticized for selecting a condom preference of "when appropriate", this has been described as inconsistent with safer sex practices"
-- philip anderson invades limited
To be honest though I would go further in that I would disagree with the actual article. "When appropriate' is a perfectly acceptable selection. If a couple have an open relationship, they may always use a condom with third parties but not with each other. Adagio67 ( talk) 10:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dudesnude. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Dudesnude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Dudesnude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)