This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American / Animated This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article is supported by the Animated films task force. United States: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force. Library of Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Animation: American / Films / Looney Tunes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as High-importance).

I believe that the Youtube video should be noted. It ends with a reference to Duck Amuck, complete with the purple frill. Look for it on Youtube and see if it would be a relevant article.

In fact, Brock Baker should definitely have more attention paid to him... - Ndrly ( talk) 10:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Since we're in some small amount of danger of getting into an edit war, I wanted to explain why I reverted this edit. While I think it's fine to clarify how Daffy asks for sound (by holding up a sign), the edit in question went into depth about how this gag was also used by two other Warner Bros. characters, which is really a bit of trivia that falls short of the general criteria for such. I'm happy to compromise by keeping the "holding up a sign" portion, but if we want to make reference to Wile E. Coyote (who's more famous for this gag), we'll need a source that backs up the notability of that bit, and the reference would be more appropriate for the production/development section. — KieferSkunk ( talk) — 03:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC) reply

The introductory text says that the short was released on January 17, 1953, while the infobox says Feb. 28, 1953. Which is right? 198.109.173.50 ( talk) 19:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC) reply