From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian ( talk) 21:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC) reply


– per rationale at Talk:Dominik Halmoši. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply

  • Support for accuracy, and per recent outcomes. -- BDD ( talk) 16:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose These marks are not needed when used in English. Rreagan007 ( talk) 19:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Except they are needed in English as they are still used in English and not having them is a spelling mistake. We are an encyclopedia so we strive to be accurate. - DJSasso ( talk) 13:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support per encyclopedic correctness and previous outcomes. Comment: WP:AT states that "Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources." HandsomeFella ( talk) 21:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support Encyclopedic accuracy. Also, consistency: even if "reliable English sources" misspell these people's names, there are no doubt other people with the same names who are not referred to in English sources -- should we make up inaccurate spellings of those people's names too? Wouldn't that be OR? Anyway, I don't do a lot of BLP work (I'm into ancient history :P ) but is the title of this page (not the others) formatted correctly? "b. 1985" looks a little weird to me, but then I wouldn't have guessed that there were two hockey players with the same name who can only be distinguished by the years they were born. elvenscout742 ( talk) 04:48, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support: Per HandsomeFella. Skinsmoke ( talk) 09:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support per HandsomeFella and Elvenscount. And per the many reasons I have given at many of these moved requests over the years. - DJSasso ( talk) 13:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom and encyclopedic accuracy. - Darwinek ( talk) 13:55, 9 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian ( talk) 21:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC) reply


– per rationale at Talk:Dominik Halmoši. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply

  • Support for accuracy, and per recent outcomes. -- BDD ( talk) 16:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose These marks are not needed when used in English. Rreagan007 ( talk) 19:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Except they are needed in English as they are still used in English and not having them is a spelling mistake. We are an encyclopedia so we strive to be accurate. - DJSasso ( talk) 13:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support per encyclopedic correctness and previous outcomes. Comment: WP:AT states that "Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources." HandsomeFella ( talk) 21:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support Encyclopedic accuracy. Also, consistency: even if "reliable English sources" misspell these people's names, there are no doubt other people with the same names who are not referred to in English sources -- should we make up inaccurate spellings of those people's names too? Wouldn't that be OR? Anyway, I don't do a lot of BLP work (I'm into ancient history :P ) but is the title of this page (not the others) formatted correctly? "b. 1985" looks a little weird to me, but then I wouldn't have guessed that there were two hockey players with the same name who can only be distinguished by the years they were born. elvenscout742 ( talk) 04:48, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support: Per HandsomeFella. Skinsmoke ( talk) 09:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support per HandsomeFella and Elvenscount. And per the many reasons I have given at many of these moved requests over the years. - DJSasso ( talk) 13:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom and encyclopedic accuracy. - Darwinek ( talk) 13:55, 9 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook