This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I hope to add pronunciation information soon, as well as an info-box, and in time create pages for all Wikilinks which lack them.
Supaiku ( talk) 23:18, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Stop me if I am egregiously incorrect here, but to in this case should mean it is the dative, not the locative or even ablative, and the suffix for the dative, ablative or locative is dependent on the root word, not just its gender. Also, if your listing the names of these poses instead of describing the action, wouldn't you maintain nominative suffixes like in yogāsanas? Hence all the -a endings in āsana names. Definitely curious to here from a Sanskrit professional. Iṣṭa Devata ( talk) 16:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I hope to add pronunciation information soon, as well as an info-box, and in time create pages for all Wikilinks which lack them.
Supaiku ( talk) 23:18, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Stop me if I am egregiously incorrect here, but to in this case should mean it is the dative, not the locative or even ablative, and the suffix for the dative, ablative or locative is dependent on the root word, not just its gender. Also, if your listing the names of these poses instead of describing the action, wouldn't you maintain nominative suffixes like in yogāsanas? Hence all the -a endings in āsana names. Definitely curious to here from a Sanskrit professional. Iṣṭa Devata ( talk) 16:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)