This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dravidian parties was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 27, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that since 1967 the state of
Tamil Nadu in
India has been ruled by
Dravidian parties? |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Why not submit this for good article nomination ? Taprobanus ( talk) 19:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't the "International impact" section at least mention the significant role played by the Dravidian parties in the Sri Lankan problem? They've certainly had a bigger impact there than in Malaysia. -- Arvind ( talk) 20:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I realised that a few of the citations have been removed. I believe that those were done on good faith. I am reverting them to hear back why they were removed, in light that the statements were not controvertial. In the mean time I will try to find alternate sources for the statements. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Per recent suggestions about the Good article review process, and to better support {{ ArticleHistory}}, I have moved all commentary concerning this article's review to a dedicated Good article review subpage. I welcome any and all comments on this review, but please, place them on the subpage. Thank you. Gosgood ( talk) 18:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Per my remarks above, the commentary that used to be here may now be found on the subpage dedicated to the Good Article review. Gosgood ( talk) 18:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. The survey will end on April 30.
At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 ( talk)( mistakes) 03:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
dear admin : i wish to work with you / anyone who wishes to improve this article . kindly do inform if im useful in any way ...regards:--
91.77.184.175 (
talk) 18:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC):--
@ the $un$hine . (
talk) 05:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
I have a feeling that we may have to restructure this article. After the GA review I think that the overall topic should start with a bit of explaining the so called North South divide as seen by leaders of the Dravidian parties, then proceed on to the rise of Justice Party (India) and the Self-respect movement of Periyar. This I reckon will give a sound base to talk further into the major events of rise the modern days (post independence) Dravidian parties. The history is very much complicates since as the Dravidian parties get stronger and stronger, the borders of the Madras Presidency keeps going down which needs to be mentioned in the article too.
Then comes the task that I'm finding too hard. The ideologies!! The Ideologies keeps evoloving as the parties fragment and with the historical happenings. The North-South divide as per the Dravidian party leaders is the basis of the ideologies of Dravidian identity and the so called Tamilism. So now this would leave the ideologies sections either fragmented into two or the whole ideologies section to preceed the history of the parties. I prefer the former, but suggestions on this are very much welcome.
The third concern is about the list of parties and the navigation box. I am wondering if it would be a good idea to change the navigation box as to stay in the corner of the article rather than as a footer and thereby the list can be avoided. Probably the navigation box can also hold the party flags and symbols, so we can get rid of them from the article too. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 14:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
What happened all the Kumari Kandam is a cradle of civilization, and the abuse of Hindu figures. It is relevant and notable enough for this article. Trips ( talk) 03:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi all. I'm starting this discussion here on which political parties can be classified as Dravidian parties and which can't. Further to a discussion here I am removing PMK from this article. The question of DMDK is still left open. Comments on this would be very helpful. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 10:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Given these bits and pieces, I'd say leave the DMDK out of here for now and let's consider adding it in if and when scholarly sources (with a reputation within this particular topic) consider the DMDK to be a Dravidian party. – Spaceman Spiff 20:25, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
The article says in the "Flags" section:
This is kinda weird: to the best of my knowledge, Soviet Russia was opposed to the Axis powers and red and black are associated with Nazi Germany, not Russia.
Am i missing something? -- Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 17:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:J. Jayalalithaa (old).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 22:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Cmmgrjanaki.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:AnnaMKMGR.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 08:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dravidian parties. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Dravidian parties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Dravidian parties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1816/18161140.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl1705/17050770.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hindustantimes.com/storypage/storypage.aspx?id=0e0859d4-737c-4827-8a55-7ec14d7cWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm bringing this topic here since some Anglo-American editors seem to think that the Template:DP-genealogy is obstructive. Do any Indian/Tamil editors share this opinion? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 11:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dravidian parties was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 27, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that since 1967 the state of
Tamil Nadu in
India has been ruled by
Dravidian parties? |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Why not submit this for good article nomination ? Taprobanus ( talk) 19:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't the "International impact" section at least mention the significant role played by the Dravidian parties in the Sri Lankan problem? They've certainly had a bigger impact there than in Malaysia. -- Arvind ( talk) 20:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I realised that a few of the citations have been removed. I believe that those were done on good faith. I am reverting them to hear back why they were removed, in light that the statements were not controvertial. In the mean time I will try to find alternate sources for the statements. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Per recent suggestions about the Good article review process, and to better support {{ ArticleHistory}}, I have moved all commentary concerning this article's review to a dedicated Good article review subpage. I welcome any and all comments on this review, but please, place them on the subpage. Thank you. Gosgood ( talk) 18:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Per my remarks above, the commentary that used to be here may now be found on the subpage dedicated to the Good Article review. Gosgood ( talk) 18:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. The survey will end on April 30.
At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 ( talk)( mistakes) 03:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
dear admin : i wish to work with you / anyone who wishes to improve this article . kindly do inform if im useful in any way ...regards:--
91.77.184.175 (
talk) 18:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC):--
@ the $un$hine . (
talk) 05:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
I have a feeling that we may have to restructure this article. After the GA review I think that the overall topic should start with a bit of explaining the so called North South divide as seen by leaders of the Dravidian parties, then proceed on to the rise of Justice Party (India) and the Self-respect movement of Periyar. This I reckon will give a sound base to talk further into the major events of rise the modern days (post independence) Dravidian parties. The history is very much complicates since as the Dravidian parties get stronger and stronger, the borders of the Madras Presidency keeps going down which needs to be mentioned in the article too.
Then comes the task that I'm finding too hard. The ideologies!! The Ideologies keeps evoloving as the parties fragment and with the historical happenings. The North-South divide as per the Dravidian party leaders is the basis of the ideologies of Dravidian identity and the so called Tamilism. So now this would leave the ideologies sections either fragmented into two or the whole ideologies section to preceed the history of the parties. I prefer the former, but suggestions on this are very much welcome.
The third concern is about the list of parties and the navigation box. I am wondering if it would be a good idea to change the navigation box as to stay in the corner of the article rather than as a footer and thereby the list can be avoided. Probably the navigation box can also hold the party flags and symbols, so we can get rid of them from the article too. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 14:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
What happened all the Kumari Kandam is a cradle of civilization, and the abuse of Hindu figures. It is relevant and notable enough for this article. Trips ( talk) 03:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi all. I'm starting this discussion here on which political parties can be classified as Dravidian parties and which can't. Further to a discussion here I am removing PMK from this article. The question of DMDK is still left open. Comments on this would be very helpful. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 10:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Given these bits and pieces, I'd say leave the DMDK out of here for now and let's consider adding it in if and when scholarly sources (with a reputation within this particular topic) consider the DMDK to be a Dravidian party. – Spaceman Spiff 20:25, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
The article says in the "Flags" section:
This is kinda weird: to the best of my knowledge, Soviet Russia was opposed to the Axis powers and red and black are associated with Nazi Germany, not Russia.
Am i missing something? -- Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 17:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:J. Jayalalithaa (old).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 22:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Cmmgrjanaki.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:AnnaMKMGR.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 08:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dravidian parties. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Dravidian parties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Dravidian parties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1816/18161140.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl1705/17050770.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hindustantimes.com/storypage/storypage.aspx?id=0e0859d4-737c-4827-8a55-7ec14d7cWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm bringing this topic here since some Anglo-American editors seem to think that the Template:DP-genealogy is obstructive. Do any Indian/Tamil editors share this opinion? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 11:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)