There is a request, submitted by Clay2004 ( talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dr. Mario article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Dr. Mario" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Dr. Mario has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
what a mess, there is a dr. mario article, which is more a series article, the is a sdr mario (video game) article and the template doesn't contain half of the games like dr. wario... Romanista 09:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I somewhat have a problem with A link to the past removing much of this content..I think it should be split into multiple articles
If we dont proceed with this then the older revision should be reverted -- larsinio (talk)
Hey, the patent says that the random number data is stored in the ROM. Wouldn't that mean that Dr. Mario clones that generate random number data without using a ROM (for example, on computers or CD-ROM-based consoles) not fall under the patent? Heck, if it turns out that Dr. Mario doesn't actually store random numbers in the ROM but instead uses a normal random number generator, it might not even be under its own patent! - furrykef ( Talk at me) 21:11, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Also regarding the patent, the link to it is broken. It's not a 404 response, but the patent isn't found in the patent database. ~ anonymous Dr. Mario fan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.26.84.199 ( talk) 18:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Meh, it works as of now.
Salvidrim (
talk) 23:08, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Is that really an incomplete list? Should the tag be removed now? I certaintly haven't heard of any more Dr. Mario games than that, unless you include Smash Bros. Melee, which isn't REALLY a Dr. Mario game. Fieari 19:51, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
Honestly, this should be about the original game, Dr. Mario, and any information on the character be moved to Mario. Dr. Mario 64 is very different, with a new gameplay mode, four players, improved graphics, a new story, and the fact that the plotline and cast is reminiscent of Wario Land more so than Super Mario Bros. - A Link to the Past (talk) 08:53, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
I agree a new article for dr. mario 64 should be started. - larsinio (talk) 8:50, August 31, 2005
I removed the sentence:
because it is almost certainly untrue, if it is true, some support is needed. Notjim 22:17, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Does anybody know of any place where I can find source code for a Dr. Mario clone? I have to make a clone of my own in Visual Basic (hehe... advanced) for my school and it'd be nice to see how somebody else did it. BirdValiant 03:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Fifteen minutes and fourty-four seconds (15:44) into Karn Evil 9, during the Second Impression, you can hear a very distinct melody. The very familiar measure sounds identical to one in Dr. Mario, the song Chill, at one minute and twenty-nine seconds (1:29). Although there is no evidence I know about that says the creators of the game borrowed the melody from the song it is not an uncommon finding in the video game world. Other infamous video game themes including ones from classics like Doom also feature "stolen" melodies. Is this relevant enough to be featured? -- The Skunk 07:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
anyone have a link to Dr. Mario's "chill" music?
The start menu music reminds me of the theme song for the Gummi Bears.
Is there any evidence that there are lyrics to the music in the game? The entire haircut and barber talk in the gameplay section seems to be completely made up. My searches in Google only bring up this article, so I've removed it. If someone can find some adequate proof, feel free to put it back. -- Jacquismo 01:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
WAT R THE SPECIFIC DATES OF THE JAPANESE N AMERICAN RELEASES —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.195.132.253 ( talk) 20:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC).
Image:Dr-Mario NESscreen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 19:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
There is a not so known Korean Dr. Mario rip-off called Dr. Hello made in 1991 by Sis Corp for MSX and then ported to SG-1000. I think that the MSX version is very, very rare to find, because there is no ROM of it. Only there's a rom of the SG-1000 version and one that is a SG-1000 ROM converted to MSX. The game has also adult stuff, like nude nurses. Also, looks like the SMS is compatible with the SG-1000, because the game is sometimes confused with a SMS game. Also, I think it was originally made for the Samsung Gam*Boy, that is a SMS clone that runs SMS games. Here are some sources (I think that those are the only internet pages about this game):
Converted MSX ROM: http://www.icongames.com.br/msxfiles/drhello/index.htm
Gameplay video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqgUa-uZlus
Information (1): http://gonintendo.com/?p=71194
Information (2): http://www.gamesniped.com/2009/02/01/sega-master-system-dr-hello-reproduction/
SMS (or SG-1000, I don't know why it says SMS) rom: http://smspower.org/db/dr_hello-sms-kr.shtml
Those are the only sources I found, and I think the only sources in internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.231.97.147 ( talk) 21:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 09:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:10, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:15, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
i've read elsewhere in wiki, that the black & white game boy cartridge can play on game boy color with a special palette. Game boy color can add colors to games, but yes, i've just try it and it works. It is not as good as the NES version, or as other game boy color games, but it has colors. but... i got this game befor super game boy and game boy color cames out, back in 1992 ! that is amazing. Super mario land (1) and alleyway have their very own palettes too, but they're crappy, Dr mario is very nice ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.8.212.160 ( talk) 16:50, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
"While parents were critical of the premise due to its inclusion of medicine in a children's game..." ...what the hell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.13.141.30 ( talk) 18:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Per request at WP:VG, I've decided to perform the assessment. This is my first time doing anything like this, but I'll give it a shot. Specifically, the request was for a C-class assessment, with, if possible, tips for further improvement to B-class.
I'm happy to say that the article, as far as I can tell, passes C-class criteria. Though some work definitely needs to be done, if I knew very little about Dr. Mario, this would give me enough information to consider myself satisfied, which seems to be the main criterion required for the class. As for B-class...
B1: References - The references are... acceptable. However, I think the article relies a bit too much on NinDB. It would be a good idea to see if you can't locate some of its information elsewhere. Neoseeker's also a bit iffy. Also, try to locate a second reference for the claim mentioned in the previous section- it seems to have been challenged, and as a particularly strange (if believable) claim, it could use the extra citation.
B2: Coverage - What is currently in the article is probably covered fairly enough. However, if it's possible, I'd like to see a bit more information on the development of the game. If that can't be done- which is fair enough, that happens sometime, especially with older or more obscure titles- perhaps go into a bit more detail about the game's impact and legacy. I feel it just needs... something, but I'm afraid I can't quite place just what.
B3: Structure - Spiffing!
B4: Grammar - No obvious grammatical mistakes, would probably pass B here as well.
B5: Support - Illustration is fine. One quirk with the infobox: it might be a decent idea to add the release dates of the Virtual Console and Game Boy Advance versions. There's probably relevant information on the latter at the
NES Classics page, and the various lists of virtual console games could aid in finding that version. (I don't know if it was released on the console virtual console, but I'm pretty sure it made it out somewhere on the 3DS one.)
B6: Clarity - Generally acceptable. Is the term 'falling block game' widely used? May want to link to
its entry on List of puzzle video games.
Overall, it's a pretty decent article. It definitely has potential if you can add just a bit more to it, but at the moment it's got a few kinks that could be worked out before B-class is considered. However, none of these should stop it from reaching C-class, so congratulations. Hammerbrodude ( talk) 01:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
I was able, after much searching, to find the full quote. Here it is:
So it seems the quote is verifiable indeed. Whether it should be presented as fact (as it is now) or as Mr. Slaven's opinion (or account of the situation) is more debatable. --Salvidrim! T· C 08:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
How lovely to be back here; it's nice to see people so dedicated to the improvement of articles. This was my first attempt as assessment back when I changed it to C-Class... and I'm pleased that it's been noticed. I've gained a bit of experience since then, so without further ado...
Per request at WP:VG, I've decided to perform the B-Class assessment. Specifically, the request was for such an assessment and any advice for possible GA status. I'll do what I can to provide this.
History:
Section B1 completed by
Emmy
Altava 07:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Sections B3 and B5 completed by
Emmy
Altava 07:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Sections B2, B4, and B6 completed up to (but not including) "Re-releases". The rest will be done (after they wake up) by
Emmy
Altava 07:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
All sections completed by
Emmy
Altava 23:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
To respond to a few concerns:
I've gone through the article and am happy with the improvements made. I've done a bit of reshuffling of the material used within the article; I think it looks a bit more full now. (Specifically, Ports merged with development to become "Development and releases", Sequels merged with "Legacy".)
Now that we're through that, let's get to the fun part.
Verdict: . Last night, I wasn't sure I'd be able to give the promotion... but after looking it over both last night and now, I think it's improved enough to where it should be able to pass a B-Class assessment with no major issue. Could the article reach GA? I think it probably could. Really, all that might need to be done would be a bit of discussion on sources.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 11:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
This simply needs approbation from two uninvolved editors. My reason for nominating the article follow:
it seems to me that this article meets all nessary critiera for an A-class aritcle, However in reviewing this aritcle I found one minor gamatical error, which I fixed. Think this article should be reviewd by at least one other editor for any other grammer or spelling errors, then promoted to A-class — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16bitz ( talk • contribs) 14:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
I think this deserves A-Class. -- J (t) 01:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: article moved. Andrewa ( talk) 23:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
– I firmly believe this is unambiguously the primary topic of Dr. Mario and that the disambiguator is superfluous. The current Dr. Mario disambiguation page should be located at Dr. Mario (disambiguation). This will require admin assistance, as per the separate pages' histories. Salvidrim! 13:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Dr. Mario assumes the role of a physician, not a doctor. Physicians are recognized for the completion of a doctorate degree in medicine (MD), which provides them with the title of a physician, medical doctor, or surgeon. Doctors, on the other hand, have completed a doctorate of philosophie (PhD) in university. They are mostly consultants and professors, not like Dr. Mario. At first, I wanted to add the "medical" in front of "doctor," but realized that the word in question was already used three times in the sentence. Therefore, I changed "doctor" to "physician," describing more accuratley Dr. Mario's role. -- MaxDawsonC ( talk) 14:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Unless any of the games or game manuals refer to him as a physician, I don't think we should use it. We don't need to be applying real world technicalities to a light-hearted, fictional character, that is very light on story or medical information in general anyways. His name is Dr. Mario. Call him a Doctor. Keep it simple. Sergecross73 msg me 19:03, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Non-native English speakers know the "doctor" can means who save life, but the word "Physician" is too rare...--
铁铁的火大了 (
talk) 08:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Non-native English speakers think that "Doctor" or "Dr." means
physician or
doctor (title) simply, and the games is a Japanese game.--
铁铁的火大了 (
talk) 09:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
I have now twice reverted the removal by
50.121.5.250 of
SNES from console list. I've invited the user to participate in this discussion... although it is a well-sourced fact, so I am unsure what discussion there is to be had. I am eager to hear his viewpoint, however.
Salvidrim!
✉ 06:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
I removed a bit of text about people holding arcade high scores because I could not find coverage of the fact in reliable, independent sources, and as such the information appears to be non-notable. :) · Salvidrim!· ✉ 16:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
In Super Smash Bros. Brawl, for Mario's normal trophy it says:
A familiar overall-clad figure who is Nintendo's flagship character. His courage and jumping ability have seen him through countless adventures. He's a multitalented plumber with the knowledge of a physician, a top-notch golfer, and a veteran tennis umpire. Is his jumping prowess a boon from his girder-climbing days?
It's almost certain that they are talking about Dr. Mario. Should we call him a physician then? --
GameBoyMad (
talk) 15:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Dr. Mario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The prototype of this game was titled Virus, not to be confused with ports of Zarch. Is there a more reliable source for this than The Cutting Room Floor ( earlier, later)? -- Damian Yerrick ( talk) 22:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
I just figured that Capsule SE made by m-bounce was cloning the Dr. Mario, right? Apollo C. Quiboloy fans ( talk) 13:05, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
According to ShiroBrawl, the fever theme was used in Puyopuyo Tetris, even though Sega own Nintendo's intellectual properties/licensed rights. ACQ322Acuity ( answer me) 00:59, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
There is a request, submitted by Clay2004 ( talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dr. Mario article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Dr. Mario" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Dr. Mario has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
what a mess, there is a dr. mario article, which is more a series article, the is a sdr mario (video game) article and the template doesn't contain half of the games like dr. wario... Romanista 09:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I somewhat have a problem with A link to the past removing much of this content..I think it should be split into multiple articles
If we dont proceed with this then the older revision should be reverted -- larsinio (talk)
Hey, the patent says that the random number data is stored in the ROM. Wouldn't that mean that Dr. Mario clones that generate random number data without using a ROM (for example, on computers or CD-ROM-based consoles) not fall under the patent? Heck, if it turns out that Dr. Mario doesn't actually store random numbers in the ROM but instead uses a normal random number generator, it might not even be under its own patent! - furrykef ( Talk at me) 21:11, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Also regarding the patent, the link to it is broken. It's not a 404 response, but the patent isn't found in the patent database. ~ anonymous Dr. Mario fan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.26.84.199 ( talk) 18:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Meh, it works as of now.
Salvidrim (
talk) 23:08, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Is that really an incomplete list? Should the tag be removed now? I certaintly haven't heard of any more Dr. Mario games than that, unless you include Smash Bros. Melee, which isn't REALLY a Dr. Mario game. Fieari 19:51, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
Honestly, this should be about the original game, Dr. Mario, and any information on the character be moved to Mario. Dr. Mario 64 is very different, with a new gameplay mode, four players, improved graphics, a new story, and the fact that the plotline and cast is reminiscent of Wario Land more so than Super Mario Bros. - A Link to the Past (talk) 08:53, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
I agree a new article for dr. mario 64 should be started. - larsinio (talk) 8:50, August 31, 2005
I removed the sentence:
because it is almost certainly untrue, if it is true, some support is needed. Notjim 22:17, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Does anybody know of any place where I can find source code for a Dr. Mario clone? I have to make a clone of my own in Visual Basic (hehe... advanced) for my school and it'd be nice to see how somebody else did it. BirdValiant 03:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Fifteen minutes and fourty-four seconds (15:44) into Karn Evil 9, during the Second Impression, you can hear a very distinct melody. The very familiar measure sounds identical to one in Dr. Mario, the song Chill, at one minute and twenty-nine seconds (1:29). Although there is no evidence I know about that says the creators of the game borrowed the melody from the song it is not an uncommon finding in the video game world. Other infamous video game themes including ones from classics like Doom also feature "stolen" melodies. Is this relevant enough to be featured? -- The Skunk 07:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
anyone have a link to Dr. Mario's "chill" music?
The start menu music reminds me of the theme song for the Gummi Bears.
Is there any evidence that there are lyrics to the music in the game? The entire haircut and barber talk in the gameplay section seems to be completely made up. My searches in Google only bring up this article, so I've removed it. If someone can find some adequate proof, feel free to put it back. -- Jacquismo 01:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
WAT R THE SPECIFIC DATES OF THE JAPANESE N AMERICAN RELEASES —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.195.132.253 ( talk) 20:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC).
Image:Dr-Mario NESscreen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 19:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
There is a not so known Korean Dr. Mario rip-off called Dr. Hello made in 1991 by Sis Corp for MSX and then ported to SG-1000. I think that the MSX version is very, very rare to find, because there is no ROM of it. Only there's a rom of the SG-1000 version and one that is a SG-1000 ROM converted to MSX. The game has also adult stuff, like nude nurses. Also, looks like the SMS is compatible with the SG-1000, because the game is sometimes confused with a SMS game. Also, I think it was originally made for the Samsung Gam*Boy, that is a SMS clone that runs SMS games. Here are some sources (I think that those are the only internet pages about this game):
Converted MSX ROM: http://www.icongames.com.br/msxfiles/drhello/index.htm
Gameplay video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqgUa-uZlus
Information (1): http://gonintendo.com/?p=71194
Information (2): http://www.gamesniped.com/2009/02/01/sega-master-system-dr-hello-reproduction/
SMS (or SG-1000, I don't know why it says SMS) rom: http://smspower.org/db/dr_hello-sms-kr.shtml
Those are the only sources I found, and I think the only sources in internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.231.97.147 ( talk) 21:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 09:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:10, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.213.102 ( talk) 10:15, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
i've read elsewhere in wiki, that the black & white game boy cartridge can play on game boy color with a special palette. Game boy color can add colors to games, but yes, i've just try it and it works. It is not as good as the NES version, or as other game boy color games, but it has colors. but... i got this game befor super game boy and game boy color cames out, back in 1992 ! that is amazing. Super mario land (1) and alleyway have their very own palettes too, but they're crappy, Dr mario is very nice ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.8.212.160 ( talk) 16:50, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
"While parents were critical of the premise due to its inclusion of medicine in a children's game..." ...what the hell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.13.141.30 ( talk) 18:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Per request at WP:VG, I've decided to perform the assessment. This is my first time doing anything like this, but I'll give it a shot. Specifically, the request was for a C-class assessment, with, if possible, tips for further improvement to B-class.
I'm happy to say that the article, as far as I can tell, passes C-class criteria. Though some work definitely needs to be done, if I knew very little about Dr. Mario, this would give me enough information to consider myself satisfied, which seems to be the main criterion required for the class. As for B-class...
B1: References - The references are... acceptable. However, I think the article relies a bit too much on NinDB. It would be a good idea to see if you can't locate some of its information elsewhere. Neoseeker's also a bit iffy. Also, try to locate a second reference for the claim mentioned in the previous section- it seems to have been challenged, and as a particularly strange (if believable) claim, it could use the extra citation.
B2: Coverage - What is currently in the article is probably covered fairly enough. However, if it's possible, I'd like to see a bit more information on the development of the game. If that can't be done- which is fair enough, that happens sometime, especially with older or more obscure titles- perhaps go into a bit more detail about the game's impact and legacy. I feel it just needs... something, but I'm afraid I can't quite place just what.
B3: Structure - Spiffing!
B4: Grammar - No obvious grammatical mistakes, would probably pass B here as well.
B5: Support - Illustration is fine. One quirk with the infobox: it might be a decent idea to add the release dates of the Virtual Console and Game Boy Advance versions. There's probably relevant information on the latter at the
NES Classics page, and the various lists of virtual console games could aid in finding that version. (I don't know if it was released on the console virtual console, but I'm pretty sure it made it out somewhere on the 3DS one.)
B6: Clarity - Generally acceptable. Is the term 'falling block game' widely used? May want to link to
its entry on List of puzzle video games.
Overall, it's a pretty decent article. It definitely has potential if you can add just a bit more to it, but at the moment it's got a few kinks that could be worked out before B-class is considered. However, none of these should stop it from reaching C-class, so congratulations. Hammerbrodude ( talk) 01:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
I was able, after much searching, to find the full quote. Here it is:
So it seems the quote is verifiable indeed. Whether it should be presented as fact (as it is now) or as Mr. Slaven's opinion (or account of the situation) is more debatable. --Salvidrim! T· C 08:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
How lovely to be back here; it's nice to see people so dedicated to the improvement of articles. This was my first attempt as assessment back when I changed it to C-Class... and I'm pleased that it's been noticed. I've gained a bit of experience since then, so without further ado...
Per request at WP:VG, I've decided to perform the B-Class assessment. Specifically, the request was for such an assessment and any advice for possible GA status. I'll do what I can to provide this.
History:
Section B1 completed by
Emmy
Altava 07:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Sections B3 and B5 completed by
Emmy
Altava 07:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Sections B2, B4, and B6 completed up to (but not including) "Re-releases". The rest will be done (after they wake up) by
Emmy
Altava 07:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
All sections completed by
Emmy
Altava 23:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
To respond to a few concerns:
I've gone through the article and am happy with the improvements made. I've done a bit of reshuffling of the material used within the article; I think it looks a bit more full now. (Specifically, Ports merged with development to become "Development and releases", Sequels merged with "Legacy".)
Now that we're through that, let's get to the fun part.
Verdict: . Last night, I wasn't sure I'd be able to give the promotion... but after looking it over both last night and now, I think it's improved enough to where it should be able to pass a B-Class assessment with no major issue. Could the article reach GA? I think it probably could. Really, all that might need to be done would be a bit of discussion on sources.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 11:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
This simply needs approbation from two uninvolved editors. My reason for nominating the article follow:
it seems to me that this article meets all nessary critiera for an A-class aritcle, However in reviewing this aritcle I found one minor gamatical error, which I fixed. Think this article should be reviewd by at least one other editor for any other grammer or spelling errors, then promoted to A-class — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16bitz ( talk • contribs) 14:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
I think this deserves A-Class. -- J (t) 01:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: article moved. Andrewa ( talk) 23:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
– I firmly believe this is unambiguously the primary topic of Dr. Mario and that the disambiguator is superfluous. The current Dr. Mario disambiguation page should be located at Dr. Mario (disambiguation). This will require admin assistance, as per the separate pages' histories. Salvidrim! 13:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Dr. Mario assumes the role of a physician, not a doctor. Physicians are recognized for the completion of a doctorate degree in medicine (MD), which provides them with the title of a physician, medical doctor, or surgeon. Doctors, on the other hand, have completed a doctorate of philosophie (PhD) in university. They are mostly consultants and professors, not like Dr. Mario. At first, I wanted to add the "medical" in front of "doctor," but realized that the word in question was already used three times in the sentence. Therefore, I changed "doctor" to "physician," describing more accuratley Dr. Mario's role. -- MaxDawsonC ( talk) 14:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Unless any of the games or game manuals refer to him as a physician, I don't think we should use it. We don't need to be applying real world technicalities to a light-hearted, fictional character, that is very light on story or medical information in general anyways. His name is Dr. Mario. Call him a Doctor. Keep it simple. Sergecross73 msg me 19:03, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Non-native English speakers know the "doctor" can means who save life, but the word "Physician" is too rare...--
铁铁的火大了 (
talk) 08:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Non-native English speakers think that "Doctor" or "Dr." means
physician or
doctor (title) simply, and the games is a Japanese game.--
铁铁的火大了 (
talk) 09:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
I have now twice reverted the removal by
50.121.5.250 of
SNES from console list. I've invited the user to participate in this discussion... although it is a well-sourced fact, so I am unsure what discussion there is to be had. I am eager to hear his viewpoint, however.
Salvidrim!
✉ 06:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
I removed a bit of text about people holding arcade high scores because I could not find coverage of the fact in reliable, independent sources, and as such the information appears to be non-notable. :) · Salvidrim!· ✉ 16:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
In Super Smash Bros. Brawl, for Mario's normal trophy it says:
A familiar overall-clad figure who is Nintendo's flagship character. His courage and jumping ability have seen him through countless adventures. He's a multitalented plumber with the knowledge of a physician, a top-notch golfer, and a veteran tennis umpire. Is his jumping prowess a boon from his girder-climbing days?
It's almost certain that they are talking about Dr. Mario. Should we call him a physician then? --
GameBoyMad (
talk) 15:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Dr. Mario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The prototype of this game was titled Virus, not to be confused with ports of Zarch. Is there a more reliable source for this than The Cutting Room Floor ( earlier, later)? -- Damian Yerrick ( talk) 22:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
I just figured that Capsule SE made by m-bounce was cloning the Dr. Mario, right? Apollo C. Quiboloy fans ( talk) 13:05, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
According to ShiroBrawl, the fever theme was used in Puyopuyo Tetris, even though Sega own Nintendo's intellectual properties/licensed rights. ACQ322Acuity ( answer me) 00:59, 20 January 2019 (UTC)